A development perspective for "corporate social responsibility'': case of Turkey

被引:40
作者
Ararat, Melsa [1 ]
机构
[1] Sabanci Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY | 2008年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
Culture; Corporate social responsibility; Regulation; Ethics; Turkey; Leadership;
D O I
10.1108/14720700810879169
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to take a snapshot of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in Turkey by exploring the role of the economy, state and societal culture. It aims to focus on the impact of cultural values on the role stakeholders play in driving corporate behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is based on a review of existing research into cultural dimensions and attitudes, surveys of corporate disclosures, interviews and cumulative knowledge of economic and social development. Findings - External factors have been major factors driving the emergence of the "CSR'' discourse in emerging markets. In the case of Turkey, for example, economic fundamentals and cultural dimensions do not reflect a strong societal influence on corporate behaviour. Drivers for CSR in Turkey will be exogenous and institutional rather than endogenous and cultural. Practical implications - The paper recommends a stronger role for regulations and law-enforcement in driving corporate accountability and social performance, also highlighting the importance of international influences. Originality/value - The originality of the paper is in exhibiting the role of societal culture in shaping business expectations and in arguing for a stronger role for public enforcement and international monitoring. The paper has relevance for regulators and international agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
AFD, 2006, SUST INV SMES PROM C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MISS STAT
[3]  
Ararat M., 2003, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, V3, P58, DOI DOI 10.1108/14720700310459863
[4]  
Ararat Melsa, 2005, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, P247, DOI 10.1007/3-540-26960-6_20
[5]  
Ascigil S., 2003, CORPORATE SOCI UNPUB
[6]  
Aupperle K. E., 1984, RES CORPORATE SOCIAL, P27
[7]  
Barnea A., 2006, EFA 2006 ZUR M
[8]  
Baron D., 2006, 1940 STANF U
[9]   A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Roe, MJ .
STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1999, 52 (01) :127-170
[10]  
Birkmen F., 2003, SEAL SOCIAL EC LAW P, P2