BONE STRENGTH OF LAYING HENS KEPT IN AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM, COMPARED WITH HENS IN CAGES AND ON DEEP-LITTER

被引:58
作者
NORGAARDNIELSEN, G
机构
[1] Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Forensic and State Veterinary Medicine, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00071669008417233
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Observations of vigorous wing movements and measurements of bone strength were compared in two experiments with birds in three different housing systems: A semi-intensive alternative system under development, a battery cage system and a deep-litter system. A significant effect of housing system on the frequency of vigorous wing movements was found. The highest frequency was seen in the deep-litter system, about half this number in the alternative system, while in the battery cages they were never observed. Corresponding to this a reduction in humerus strength of 9% was found in hens from the alternative system and of 45% in hens from cages, compared with deep-litter. A reduction in tibial breaking strength was also found in caged hens, when compared to deep-litter hens. Keeping hens in cages thus restricts their movements, especially wing movements, to the degree that bone strength is greatly reduced. This has welfare implications, for hens with low bone breaking strength risk a possibility of breakage, especially when handled and transported. When alternative systems are designed opportunities for movement in the three dimensions should be considered. © 1990, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF CAGES AND SEMI-INTENSIVE DEEP LITTER PENS ON BEHAVIOR, ADRENAL RESPONSE AND PRODUCTION IN 2 STRAINS OF LAYING HENS [J].
BAREHAM, JR .
BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1972, 128 (03) :153-&
[2]   PATTERNS OF COMFORT BEHAVIOR AND ACTIVITY IN DOMESTIC-FOWLS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN CAGES AND PENS [J].
BLACK, AJ ;
HUGHES, BO .
BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1974, 130 (01) :23-33
[3]  
Couch J. R., 1955, FEED AGE, V5, P88
[4]  
DUNN OJ, 1977, BASIC STATISTICS PRI
[5]   EFFECT OF BODY SIZE AND CAGE PROFILE ON THE SHEAR-STRENGTH OF BONES OF CAGED LAYERS [J].
HARNER, JP ;
WILSON, JH .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1985, 26 (04) :543-548
[6]  
HARTFIEL W., 1970, Arch. Geflugelk., V34, P190
[7]   ON THE PROBLEM OF MOVEMENT RESTRAINT TICS, STEREOTYPED MOVEMENTS, HYPERACTIVITY [J].
Levy, David M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 1944, 14 (04) :644-671
[8]  
MARTIN G, 1975, Angewandte Ornithologie, V4, P145
[9]   RELATIONSHIP OF PEN HEIGHT TO BONE STRENGTH OF BROILERS [J].
MAY, JD ;
MERKLEY, JW ;
MALONE, GW ;
CHALOUPKA, GW .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1981, 60 (03) :546-549
[10]  
MCLEAN KA, 1986, RES DEV AGRIC, V3, P93