CURRENT PERCEPTIONS OF REHABILITATION PROFESSIONALS TOWARDS MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

被引:22
作者
HARRINGTON, DE
MALEC, J
CICERONE, K
KATZ, HT
机构
[1] COASTLINE COMMUNITY COLL,NEWPORT BEACH,CA
[2] JOHNSON REHABIL INST,EDISON,NJ
[3] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[4] REHABIL INST NEW ORLEANS,NEW ORLEANS,LA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1993年 / 74卷 / 06期
关键词
MINOR HEAD INJURY; POSTCONCUSSION SYNDROME; POSTTRAUMATIC HEAD SYNDROME; TRAUMATIC HEAD INJURY;
D O I
10.1016/0003-9993(93)90155-4
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
There has been long-standing controversy in the medical literature and increasing interest within the rehabilitation field in mild traumatic brain injury and postconcussion syndrome. The Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine conducted an opinion survey to analyze the perceptions of rehabilitation professionals towards patient's with these problems. The survey initally compared response patterns of rehabilitation personnel to two earlier identical surveys made with a group of neurosurgeons and a group of neuropsychologists. A a group, rehabilitation professionals tend to have perceptions of mild traumatic brain injury that are similar to those of neuropsychologists. The survey also included a group of questions developed to analyze specific issues among rehabilitation professionals related to symptomatology, persistence, and treatment. The most salient findings concluded that rehabilitation providers (1) want a grading system associated with the term to designate injury severity, symptom severity, and level of functional impairment; (2) most frequently use neuropsychologists in assessment and treatment of these patients; (3) report cognitive deficits as the most common symptom, followed by irritability and somatic complaints; (4) when medications are used, most frequently use antidepressants; (5) typically follow these patients anywhere from six to 18 months postinjury; and (6) report that most patients make a complete functional recovery, though there is a substantial proportion (about 25%) who do not. Implications drawn from the survey include that there is a need to better define the term and its associated features and that there is a substantial group of patients who remain at least partially functionally disabled and present a major challenge to the rehabilitation community. © 1993.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Alves WM., 1986, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V1, P1
[2]   LAYPERSONS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SEQUELAE OF MINOR HEAD-INJURY AND WHIPLASH [J].
AUBREY, JB ;
DOBBS, AR ;
RULE, BG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 52 (07) :842-846
[3]  
AUERBACK AH, 1967, DIS NERV SYST, V29, P110
[4]  
BENTON AL, 1989, MILD HEAD INJURY
[5]  
BINDER LM, 1986, J CLIN EXPER NEUROPS, V8, P321
[6]  
ERICKSEN JE, 1882, CONCUSSION SPINE NER
[7]  
Gennarelli T.A., 1986, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V1, P23
[8]   THE INCIDENCE OF ACUTE BRAIN INJURY AND SERIOUS IMPAIRMENT IN A DEFINED POPULATION [J].
KRAUS, JF ;
BLACK, MA ;
HESSOL, N ;
LEY, P ;
ROKAW, W ;
SULLIVAN, C ;
BOWERS, S ;
KNOWLTON, S ;
MARSHALL, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1984, 119 (02) :186-201
[9]  
MCMORDIE WR, 1988, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V2, P198, DOI DOI 10.1080/13854048808520102
[10]  
PAGE H, 1885, INJURIES SPINE SPINA