NORMAL CERVICAL-SPINE MORPHOMETRY AND CERVICAL SPINAL STENOSIS IN ASYMPTOMATIC PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS - PLAIN FILM RADIOGRAPHY, MULTIPLANAR COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING

被引:130
作者
HERZOG, RJ
WIENS, JJ
DILLINGHAM, MF
SONTAG, MJ
机构
[1] Neuro Skeletal Imaging Center, Daly, CA, 94015
关键词
CERVICAL SPINE MORPHOMETRY; CERVICAL SPINAL STENOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199106001-00001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis or instability rests on the objective findings depicted on static and dynamic radiographs. Before abnormal spinal morphometry can be determined, it is first necessary to establish normal values for the specific patient population being evaluated. Several studies have attempted to establish norms for plain film measurements of the cervical spine in children and adults, but few have applied consistent methods for generating precise measurements. The first part of this study established normal values for cervical spinal morphometry and segmental spinal motion in the elite athlete. The second part of this study determined the most accurate screening method for detecting cervical spinal stenosis. Three sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal were compared to determine which represented the smallest midline diameter on static and dynamic radiographs. The Torg ratio was also evaluated as a method to detect significant cervical spinal stenosis and was shown to have a high sensitivity but poor positive predictive value. The study clarified why the ratio yields a large number of false positive cases. From the results of this study, an algorithm has been developed for the evaluation of stenosis of the cervical spine in athletes.
引用
收藏
页码:S178 / S186
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Alley R., Head and neck injuries in high school football, JAMA, 188, 5, (1964)
[2]  
Black W., How to evaluate the radiology literature, AJR, 154, pp. 17-22, (1990)
[3]  
Bolender N., Schonstrom N., Spengler D., Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis, J Bone Joint Surg, 67, pp. 240-246, (1985)
[4]  
Burrows E., The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis, Clin Radiol, 14, pp. 77-86, (1963)
[5]  
Cowell H., Radiographic measurements and clinical decisions, J Bone Joint Surg, 72A, 3, (1990)
[6]  
Czervionke L., Daniels D., Wehrli F., Et al., Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging, AJNR, 9, pp. 1149-1155, (1988)
[7]  
Edwards W.S., La Rocca S.H., The developmental segmental sagittal diameter in combined cervical and lumbar spondylosis, Spine, 10, 1, pp. 42-49, (1985)
[8]  
Eismont F., Clifford S., Goldberg M., Green B., Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury, Spine, 9, 7, pp. 663-666, (1984)
[9]  
Ellis W., Green D., Holzaepfel N., Sahs A., The trampoline and serious neurological injuries, JAMA, 174, 13, pp. 1673-1676, (1960)
[10]  
Epstein J., Carras R., Hyman R., Costa S., Cervical myelopathy caused by developmental stenosis of the spinal canal, J Neurosurg, 51, pp. 363-367, (1979)