Determining the ERP package-selecting criteria The case of Turkish manufacturing companies

被引:74
作者
Baki, Birdogan [1 ]
Cakar, Kemal [2 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Business Adm, Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Small & Medium Ind Dev Org, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Manufacturing resource planning; Selection; Surveys; Turkey;
D O I
10.1108/14637150510578746
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - To determine what criteria are used in enterprise resource planning (ERP) selection process and what criteria are the most important for firms. Design/methodology/approach - Through an extensive literature review, 15 selection criteria for the ERP selection process were identified and two were added after initial interviews. A questionnaire including these criteria was formed to secure data from companies. A single informant method was used for each company. To measure the importance of various critical factors a five-point Likert scale was used in the questionnaire. Findings - Fit with parent/allied organisation systems is identified as the most important selection criterion. Cross-module integration, compatibility between other systems, and references of the vendor are identified important factors respectively. Statistically significant differences were also determined between companies using MRP/MRPII versus those using own or no program for "better fit with organisational structure" and "fit with parent/allied organisational systems" criteria. Research limitations/implications - The effect of each selection criterion on ERP implementations failure rates is still to be investigated. Practical implications - Useful information about selection criteria on ERP systems for both vendors and firms planning to use these systems. Originality/value - Two new selection criteria were proposed for the ERP system selection process and some important differences between the criteria used by firms from developed countries and developing countries are determined.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Avshalom A., 2000, NEW APPROACH ERP CUS
[2]  
Bernroider E., 2001, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V7, P251, DOI DOI 10.1108/14637150110392746
[3]  
BERNROIDER E, 2000, AM C INF SYST AMCIS, P1022
[4]   Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation [J].
Bingi, P ;
Sharma, MK ;
Godla, JK .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1999, 16 (03) :7-14
[5]  
Brewer G, 2000, I&CS-INSTR CON SYST, V73, P49
[6]   EVALUATION OF DSS USE IN HONG-KONG MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES [J].
CHUNG, WWC ;
TAM, MMC ;
SAXENA, KBC ;
YUNG, KL .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 1993, 21 (03) :307-324
[7]   Computerization strategy for small manufacturing enterprises in Hong Kong [J].
Chung, WWC ;
Chik, SKO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2001, 14 (02) :141-153
[8]  
Davenport TH, 1998, HARVARD BUS REV, V76, P121
[9]  
Hecht B, 1997, DATAMATION, V43, P56
[10]   Formalising ERP selection criteria [J].
Illa, XB ;
Franch, X ;
Pastor, JA .
TENTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN, 2000, :115-122