Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO personality inventory-revised

被引:10
作者
Cattell, HEP
机构
[1] Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, 61824-1188, Illinois
关键词
D O I
10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1307
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper comments on unusual results recently published by Byravan and Ramanaiah. Their factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised showed the scales of the two tests to be largely unrelated. However, two recent factor analyses of these tests show strong relationships between the two sets of global factors-as strong as between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised five factors and Goldberg's big-five factors. Possible reasons for the discrepancy are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1311
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   STRUCTURE OF THE 16-PF 5TH-EDITION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE 5-FACTOR MODEL [J].
BYRAVAN, A ;
RAMANAIAH, NV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 76 (02) :555-560
[2]  
CATTELL HE, 1995, M AM PSYCHOL ASS NEW
[3]  
CONN SR, 1994, 16PF 5TH EDITION TEC
[4]  
Costa P. T., 1985, NEO PERSONALITY INVE
[5]   PERSONALITY STRUCTURE - EMERGENCE OF THE 5-FACTOR MODEL [J].
DIGMAN, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 41 :417-440
[6]  
Goldberg L. R., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V4, P26, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
[7]  
SAUCIER G, 1995, THEORETICAL PERSPECT