CANCER-PATIENTS DECISION-MAKING AND TRIAL-ENTRY PREFERENCES - THE EFFECTS OF FRAMING INFORMATION ABOUT SHORT-TERM TOXICITY AND LONG-TERM SURVIVAL

被引:92
作者
LLEWELLYNTHOMAS, HA [1 ]
MCGREAL, MJ [1 ]
THIEL, EC [1 ]
机构
[1] ONTARIO CANC INST,TORONTO,ON M4X 1K9,CANADA
关键词
FRAMING EFFECT; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; QUALITY OF LIFE; DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X9501500103
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The study purpose was to determine whether the framing of treatment information influenced patients' reported preferences for participating in treatment decision making and for trial entry. Ninety cancer patients read either neutrally-, positively-, or negatively-framed information about a chemotherapeutic treatment, then indicated their preferences for participating in the treatment decision, and whether they would participate in a clinical trial incorporating this protocol. There was no difference across information groups in preferences for participating in treatment decision making or willingness to enter such a clinical trial. Preference for participation in treatment decision making was significantly related to age (t = 2.54; p = 0.022), sex (x2 = 3.89; p = 0.05), and education (t = 2.54; p = 0.018); trial entry preferences were unrelated to these demographic variables. These results imply that, in this clinical context, attitudes towards participation in treatment decision making may be associated with characteristics of the patient, and attitudes towards trial entry may be dependent upon the clinical characteristics of a particular trial, but neither set of attitudes is influenced by the framing of protocol information.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 12
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Beauchamp TLC, 2019, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[2]   INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING PREFERENCES OF HOSPITALIZED ADULT CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
BLANCHARD, CG ;
LABRECQUE, MS ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLANCHARD, EB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (11) :1139-1145
[3]   ATTITUDES TOWARD CLINICAL-TRIALS AMONG PATIENTS AND THE PUBLIC [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
LUSK, EJ ;
MILLER, DS ;
HURWITZ, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (08) :968-970
[4]   INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) :832-836
[5]   PREFERENCES FOR TREATMENT CONTROL AMONG ADULTS WITH CANCER [J].
DEGNER, LF ;
RUSSELL, CA .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1988, 11 (06) :367-374
[6]   SOURCES OF BIAS IN ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR UTILITY-FUNCTIONS [J].
HERSHEY, JC ;
KUNREUTHER, HC ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1982, 28 (08) :936-954
[7]   PROSPECT THEORIES REFLECTION HYPOTHESIS - A CRITICAL-EXAMINATION [J].
HERSHEY, JC ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1980, 25 (03) :395-418
[8]   CHOICES, VALUES, AND FRAMES [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (04) :341-350
[9]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PREFERENCES [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1982, 246 (01) :160-&
[10]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291