An illusion of success: The consequences of British rail privatisation

被引:29
作者
Bowman, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, ESRC Ctr Res Sociocultural Change CRESC, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Work & Dev Inst, Andrew W Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow Soc, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Work & Dev Inst SWOP, Andrew Bowman Soc, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Privatisation; Network Rail; Subsidies; Train operating companies; Franchising;
D O I
10.1016/j.accfor.2014.10.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This article accounts for the British experiment with rail privatisation and how it has worked out economically and politically. The focus is not simply on profitability and public subsidy, but on the appearances which accounting arrangements create. The article scrutinises the Network Rail subsidy regime, which enables train operators to achieve fictitious profitability without increased direct state support. This enables supporters of privatisation to claim train operators produce a net gain for the British taxpayer. The claim forms the heart of a trade narrative which is employed by the industry and their political backers to deflect criticism and stymy reform. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 63
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Affinity Water,, 2013, AFF WAT ANN REP FIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NETW RAIL INFR LTD R
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CONCEIT ENTERPRISE T
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NETW RAIL INFR LTD R
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NEWT RAIL INFR LTD R
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BBC NEWS
[7]  
Bowman A., 2013, GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY
[8]  
Branson R., 2013, GUARDIAN
[9]  
British Railways Board, 1963, RESH BRIT RAILW 1
[10]   The conditions for high and stable growth and employment [J].
Brown, G .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2001, 111 (471) :C30-C44