LEVELS OF PERSPECTIVES AND THE PERCEPTION OF INTIMACY IN CROSS-SEX FRIENDSHIPS - A BALANCE THEORY EXPLANATION OF SHARED PERCEPTUAL REALITY

被引:18
作者
MONSOUR, M
BETTY, S
KURZWEIL, N
机构
[1] University of Colorado, Denver
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0265407593104004
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Higher levels of interpersonal perception in personal relationships have been relatively ignored over the last decade, as well as the role played by those perceptions in the creation of a relationship. Through utilization of Balance Theory and a variation of Laing's Interpersonal Perception Method, this study investigated multiple levels of interpersonal perception in cross-sex friendships, and how those perceptions help create a shared perceptual reality among cross-sex friends. One hundred and three pairs of cross-sex friends completed a survey examining direct perspectives (DPs), metaperspectives (MPs), and metametaperspectives (MMPs), on various manifestations of intimacy, the importance of the friendship and the definition of the relationship. As predicted by Balance Theory, there was significant agreement, understanding and realization of understanding between cross-sex friends concerning intimacy in the relationship and the importance of friendship. Results also reveal that perceived agreement and perceived understanding in those friendships was significantly greater than actual agreement and understanding. In addition, there was strong evidence that individuals in cross-sex friendships use their own attitudes as a basis for predicting the attitudes of their partner - that they create their partner's perspectives so that they more closely agree with their own (i.e. they assimilate). These results question the acceptability of higher-order perspectives as fully validated constructs, and suggest that the location of explanatory force in POX systems may reside in individual level variables - as opposed to dyadic level measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 550
页数:22
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PERCEPTIONS OF CONFLICT IN THE 1ST YEAR OF MARRIAGE - HOW IMPORTANT ARE SIMILARITY AND UNDERSTANDING [J].
ACITELLI, LK ;
DOUVAN, E ;
VEROFF, J .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1993, 10 (01) :5-19
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J EDUC TECHNOL SYST, V46, P4, DOI [10.1177/0047239516661713, DOI 10.1177/0047239516661713]
[3]  
Berger C.R., 1975, HUMAN COMMUNICATION, V1, P99, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2958.1975.TB00258.X, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x]
[4]  
BLALOCK HM, 1960, SOCIAL STATISTICS
[5]   PERCEIVED UNDERSTANDING AND INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS [J].
CAHN, DD .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1990, 7 (02) :231-244
[6]  
DIXSON MALS RELATI, 1993, INDIVIDUALS RELATION
[7]  
Duck S., 1983, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V1, P27, DOI [10.1521/JSCP.1983.1.1.27, DOI 10.1521/JSCP.1983.1.1.27]
[8]  
Heider F., 1958, PSYCHOL INTERPERSONA, DOI DOI 10.1037/10628-000
[9]  
Hinde R. A., 1979, UNDERSTANDING RELATI
[10]  
Kelley HH, 1983, CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS