CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER PRACTICES - RESULTS OF A SURVEY

被引:43
作者
CLEMENCE, MA [1 ]
WALKER, D [1 ]
FARR, BM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV VIRGINIA,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT INTERNAL MED,BOX 473,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22908
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0196-6553(95)90002-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The incidence of nosocomial bloodstream infections has increased twofold to threefold in the past decade, and central venous catheters infections account for about 90% of catheter-related nosocomial bloodstream infections. Many studies of risk factors for central venous catheter complications have been conducted, resulting in recommendations for preventive strategies, but few data are available regarding the frequency with which such strategies are employed in clinical practice. Methods: A survey was conducted of persons attending a meeting of the National Association of Vascular Access Networks in New Orleans on September 25, 1992. The survey contained 15 questions related to central venous catheters regarding infection control measures, measures to maintain patency, and use of the catheter for obtaining blood specimens for diagnostic tests. Results: Ninety-two persons from 24 states completed the questionnaire as representatives of 23 teaching hospitals, 21 nonteaching hospitals, and 48 home health agencies. Transparent dressings were used more frequently (88%) than cotton gauze (27%). Alcohol and povidone-iodine solutions were the most frequently used antiseptics. Antimicrobial ointment was used by fewer than half; of these, 86% used povidone-iodine and 26% used polymyxin-neomycin-bacitracin. Heparin flushes were still being used by 97% to maintain patency. Most (82%) used central venous catheters to draw blood cultures; of these, 68% drew only qualitative cultures and 32% drew quantitative cultures in addition to or instead of qualitative cultures. Conclusions: Significant diversity of practice was documented among the health care organizations represented in this survey. Some of the practices documented in this survey have been associated with higher rates of bloodstream infection; this may partially explain the observed increase during the past decade in the incidence of nosocomial bloodstream infections.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 12
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Maki, Infections due to infusion therapy, Hospital infections, (1992)
  • [2] Banerjee, Emori, Culver, Et al., Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States 1980–1989, The American Journal of Medicine, 91, pp. 87S-89S, (1991)
  • [3] Maki, Nosocomial bloodstream infections, Proceedings of the third decennial international conference on nosocomial infections, (1990)
  • [4] Conly, Grieves, Peters, A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters, J Infect Dis, 159, pp. 310-319, (1989)
  • [5] Katich, Band, Local infection of the intravenous-cannulae wound associated with transparent dressings, J Infect Dis, 151, pp. 971-972, (1985)
  • [6] Powell, Regan, Fabri, Ruberg, Evaluation of Opsite catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective randomized study, JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr, 6, pp. 43-46, (1982)
  • [7] Craven, Lichtenberg, Kunches, Et al., A randomized study comparing a transparent polyurethane dressing to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites, Infect Control, 6, pp. 361-366, (1985)
  • [8] Hoffmann, Weber, Samsa, Rutala, Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing: a meta-analysis of the infection risks, JAMA, 267, pp. 2072-2076, (1992)
  • [9] Maki, Will, Colonization and infection associated with transparent dressings for central venous, arterial, and Hickman catheters: a comparative trial, Program and abstracts of the 24th interscience conference on antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, (1984)
  • [10] Hampton, Sherertz, Vascular-access infections in hospitalized patients, Surg Clin N Am, 68, pp. 57-71, (1989)