COGNITIVE MODELS OF STEREOTYPE CHANGE .3. SUBTYPING AND THE PERCEIVED TYPICALITY OF DISCONFIRMING GROUP MEMBERS

被引:157
作者
JOHNSTON, L [1 ]
HEWSTONE, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BRISTOL,BRISTOL BS8 1TH,AVON,ENGLAND
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0022-1031(92)90051-K
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two studies investigated the effects of the presentation of stereotype-inconsistent information on stereotype change. The implications of three cognitive models of schema change-the "bookkeeping," "conversion," and "subtyping" models (Weber & Crocker, 1983)-were considered. Experiment 1 varied the pattern of stereotype-inconsistent information (concentrated in a few group members, dispersed across many, or intermediate between the two) to compare versions of these models. Trait ratings showed the greatest stereotype change when the stereotype-inconsistent information was dispersed across group members. Typicality measures showed the slight disconfirmers of the dispersed condition to be considered more typical of the group than the strong disconfirmers of the concentrated condition. This was emphasised by a sorting task: in the concentrated condition, the stereotype-disconfirmers were more strongly isolated from the rest of the group than in the dispersed conditions. Multiple regression analyses revealed that only the perceived typicality of disconfirmers mediated stereotype change. Experiment 2 replicated the main findings using microcomputer presentation and also varied the order of stereotypic trait ratings and typicality judgments. Again trait ratings showed the greatest stereotype change in the dispersed condition and reading times were longer for disconfirmers than confirmers, but only in the dispersed condition. Overall, these studies give strong support to a prototype version of the subtyping model. © 1992.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 386
页数:27
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PERCEPTIONS OF THE ELDERLY - STEREOTYPES AS PROTOTYPES [J].
BREWER, MB ;
DULL, V ;
LUI, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 41 (04) :656-670
[2]  
Crocker J., 1984, ATTITUDINAL JUDGMENT, P197
[3]  
Fazio R. H., 1990, REV PERSONALITY SOCI, V11, P74, DOI DOI 10.1037/031329
[4]   CATEGORY-BASED AND ATTRIBUTE-BASED REACTIONS TO OTHERS - SOME INFORMATIONAL CONDITIONS OF STEREOTYPING AND INDIVIDUATING PROCESSES [J].
FISKE, ST ;
NEUBERG, SL ;
BEATTIE, AE ;
MILBERG, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 23 (05) :399-427
[5]  
Fiske SusanT., 1986, HDB MOTIVATION COGNI, P167
[6]   INDUCTION OF CATEGORY DISTRIBUTIONS - A FRAMEWORK FOR CLASSIFICATION LEARNING [J].
FRIED, LS ;
HOLYOAK, KJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1984, 10 (02) :234-257
[7]   EFFECTS OF CONFIRMATIONS AND DISCONFIRMATIONS ON STEREOTYPE-BASED ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
GURWITZ, SB ;
DODGE, KA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 35 (07) :495-500
[8]  
Hamilton D. L., 1979, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, P53, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60259-2
[9]  
HEWSTONE M, 1991, GENERAL M EUROPEAN A
[10]  
Hewstone M., 1986, CONTACT CONFLICT INT, P1