MUSSELS - THE FORGOTTEN FAUNA OF REGULATED RIVERS - A CASE-STUDY OF THE CANEY FORK RIVER

被引:79
作者
LAYZER, JB
GORDON, ME
ANDERSON, RM
机构
[1] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Tennessee Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee
[2] Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204
来源
REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT | 1993年 / 8卷 / 1-2期
关键词
MUSSELS; DAM CONSTRUCTION; LIFE HISTORY REQUIREMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/rrr.3450080110
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the past century freshwater mussel populations have declined precipitously throughout North America. Much of this loss has resulted from the construction of dams. In the Cumberland River system, 23% (22 species) of the historic mussel fauna is extinct or listed as endangered. Several additional species have either been extirpated from the Cumberland River or exist only in small, non-reproducing populations. Mussels of headwater streams have been severely affected by coal mining and poor land use practices. An intensive survey was conducted in the Caney Fork River, a major tributary to the Cumberland River, to determine the historic and extant mussel fauna. The results indicate that at least 37 species of mussels have been extirpated from the Caney Fork River, mainly as a result of the construction and operation of the Center Hill Dam. Among the species extirpated, two are now extinct, five are endangered and five are candidates for listing as threatened or endangered. Effects associated with this dam include the inundation of 102 km of riverine habitat, the discharge of hypolimnetic water (which limits mussel reproduction) and an alternating pattern of stream bed scouring and dewatering. The recognition of mussel life history requirements during preconstruction could have reduced many of these effects.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Anderson R.M., (1989)
[2]  
Anderson R.M., Layzer J.B., Gordon M.E., Recent catastrophic decline of mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Little South Fork Cumberland River, Kentucky, Brimleyana, 17, pp. 1-8, (1991)
[3]  
Coker R.E., Shira A.F., Clark W.H., Howard A.D., Natural history and propagation of freshwater mussels, Bull. U. S. Bur. Fisheries, 37, pp. 77-181, (1921)
[4]  
Davenport D., Warmuth M., Notes on the relationship between the freshwater mussel, Anodonta implicate Say and the alewife, Pomolobus pseudoharengus (Wilson), Limnol. Oceanogr., 10, (1965)
[5]  
Fisher S.G., LaVoy A., Differences in littoral fauna due to fluctuating water levels below a hydroelectric dam, Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, pp. 1472-1476, (1972)
[6]  
Gordon M.E., Layzer J.B., (1989)
[7]  
Gordon J.A., Ramachandran N., (1986)
[8]  
Gordon J.A., Martin R.E., Hunter M.A., (1986)
[9]  
Gore J.A., Nestler J.M., Layzer J.B., Instream flow predictions and management options for biota affected by peakingpower hydroelectric operations, Regul. Riv., 3, pp. 35-48, (1989)
[10]  
Gore J.A., Nestler J.M., Layzer J.B., (1990)