STUDY OF DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP IN CONTACT SENSITIVITY USING AN INVITRO ASSAY

被引:13
作者
LI, Q
AOYAMA, K
机构
[1] Department of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, 890
关键词
CONTACT SENSITIVITY; DOSE-RESPONSE; INVITRO; GUINEA PIG SENSITIZATION; 1-CHLORO-2,4-DINITROBENZENE (DNCB); 2,4-DINITROBENZENE SULFONIC SALT (DNBS); CROSS-REACTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb05192.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Dose-response relationships in contact sensitivity were evaluated in guinea pigs using an in vitro assay. Guinea pigs were sensitized with different doses of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNCB) and challenged with DNCB and 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic salt (DNBS). Lymph node cells from sensitized and control guinea pigs were cultured in the presence of different doses of DNCB and DNBS at 8 x 10(5) cells/well, respectively. The sensitivity was evaluated by the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), which was assessed by uptake of H-3-thymidine. The results indicated that there were significant correlations between the doses of sensitizers and the values of LTT in both phases of induction and challenge. Thus. the presence of higher numbers of LTT-reactive lymphocytes in the circulation may well correlate with the sensitizing doses. The values examined by in vitro assay correlated well with patch test readings (r = 0.653), indicating that following the increment of degree of patch test reactions, the values of SI were also increased. The in vitro LTT may discriminate between positive patch test reactions and negative or doubtful reactions, but not between weak positive and strong positive reactions. The in vitro assay reproduced the cross-reaction between DNCB and DNBS which was confirmed in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 21
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ALTAWIL NG, 1981, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V61, P296
[2]   CONTACT ALLERGY TO THE PRESERVATIVE KATHON CG [J].
BJORKNER, B ;
BRUZE, M ;
DAHLQUIST, I ;
FREGERT, S ;
GRUVBERGER, B ;
PERSSON, K .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (02) :85-90
[3]   DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN GUINEA PIG [J].
BUEHLER, EV .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1965, 91 (02) :171-&
[4]  
Draize J. H., 1959, APPRAISAL SAFETY CHE, P46
[5]   DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS FOR TOPICALLY APPLIED ANTIGENS [J].
EUN, HC ;
MARKS, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 122 (04) :491-499
[6]   THE DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN NICKEL-SENSITIVE AND NON-NICKEL-SENSITIVE SUBJECTS BY AN INVITRO LYMPHOCYTE-TRANSFORMATION TEST [J].
EVERNESS, KM ;
GAWKRODGER, DJ ;
BOTHAM, PA ;
HUNTER, JAA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 122 (03) :293-298
[7]  
FISHER AA, 1986, CONTACT DERMATITIS, P9
[8]  
FRIEDMANN PS, 1983, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V53, P709
[9]  
GIMINEZCAMARASA JM, 1975, BRIT J DERMATOL, V92, P9
[10]   COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND AND CALIPER MEASUREMENTS OF NORMAL AND INFLAMED SKIN THICKNESS [J].
LAWRENCE, CM ;
SHUSTER, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1985, 112 (02) :195-200