Tensile strength of thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness

被引:32
作者
Alster, D
Feilzer, AJ
DeGee, AJ
Davidson, CL
机构
[1] Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, ACTA, 1066 EA Amsterdam
关键词
resin composites; tensile strength; layer thickness;
D O I
10.1177/00220345950740110501
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
As a rule, cast restorations do not allow for free curing contraction of the resin composite luting cement. In a rigid situation, the resulting contraction stress is inversely proportional to the resin layer thickness. Adhesive technology has demonstrated, however, that thin joints may be considerably stronger than thicker ones. To investigate the effects of layer thickness and contraction stress on the tensile strength of resin composite joints, we cured cylindrical samples of a chemically initiated resin composite (Clearfil F2) in restrained conditions and subsequently loaded them in tension. The samples had a diameter of 5.35 mm and thicknesses of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 mu m, 1.4 mm, or 2.7 mm. None of the samples fractured due to contraction stress prior to tensile loading. Tensile strength decreased gradually from 62 +/- 2 MPa for the 50-mu m layer to 31 +/- 4 MPa for the 2.7-mm layer. The failures were exclusively cohesive in resin for layers between 50 and 400 mu m thick. Between 500 and 700 mu m the failures were cohesive or mixed adhesive/cohesive, while the 1.4- and 2.7-mm layers always failed in a mixed adhesive/cohesive mode. For the resin composite tested, the contraction stress did not endanger the cohesive strength. It was concluded that if adhesion to tooth structure were improved, thinner adhesive joints might enhance the clinical success of luted restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:1745 / 1748
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] VARIABLES AFFECTING BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN-BONDED BRIDGE CEMENTS
    AKSU, MN
    POWERS, JM
    LOREY, RE
    KOLLING, JN
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 1987, 3 (01) : 26 - 28
  • [2] Chappell R P, 1994, Quintessence Int, V25, P359
  • [3] DESTRUCTIVE STRESSES IN ADHESIVE LUTING CEMENTS
    DAVIDSON, CL
    VANZEGHBROECK, L
    FEILZER, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1991, 70 (05) : 880 - 882
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF FILM THICKNESS ON THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF A PROSTHODONTIC ADHESIVE
    DIAZARNOLD, AM
    WILLIAMS, VD
    AQUILINO, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 66 (05) : 614 - 618
  • [5] FACTORS AFFECTING INVITRO BOND STRENGTH OF NO-MIX ORTHODONTIC CEMENTS
    EVANS, LB
    POWERS, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 87 (06) : 508 - 512
  • [6] SETTING STRESS IN COMPOSITE RESIN IN RELATION TO CONFIGURATION OF THE RESTORATION
    FEILZER, AJ
    DEGEE, AJ
    DAVIDSON, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (11) : 1636 - 1639
  • [7] TEMPORARY FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES FABRICATED BY MEANS OF ACID-ETCH RESIN TECHNIQUE - REPORT OF 86 CASES FOLLOWED FOR UP TO 3 YEARS
    JORDAN, RE
    SUZUKI, M
    SILLS, PS
    GRATTON, DR
    GWINNETT, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 96 (06) : 994 - 1001
  • [8] Jost-Brinkmann P G, 1992, J Clin Orthod, V26, P718
  • [9] POLYMER TO METAL ADHESION - THE SYSTEM POLYVINYL ACETATE-STEEL
    LASOSKI, SW
    KRAUS, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, 1955, 18 (89): : 359 - 376
  • [10] Mackay F, 1992, Br J Orthod, V19, P35