SEPARATION ANXIETY - THE ETIOLOGY OF NONDISJUNCTION IN FLIES AND PEOPLE - COMMENTARY

被引:65
作者
HAWLEY, RS [1 ]
FRAZIER, JA [1 ]
RASOOLY, R [1 ]
机构
[1] ST JOHNS UNIV,DEPT BIOL,JAMAICA,NY 11439
关键词
D O I
10.1093/hmg/3.9.1521
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two new studies examine the recombinational history of human chromosomes that nondisjoin at the first meiotic division in females. Our analysis of these studies suggests two possible etiologies of nondisjunction in terms of well-understood properties of chromosome mechanics. For both the X chromosome and for chromosome 21, 60 - 70% of nondisjoined chromosomes are derived from chiasmate bivalents, many of which display unusual patterns of exchange. The patterns of exchange and nondisjunction observed for human chromosome 21 parallel those exhibited by a mutation in Drosophila that impairs spindle assembly and function. Based on these similarities, we propose that nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in human females results from an age-dependent loss of spindle-forming ability. The recombinational histories of nondisjoining human X chromosomes are quite different from those of chromosome 21, but rather parallel those obtained for spontaneous nondisjunction in Drosophila females. The data for X chromosome disjunction in both species can be explained by a model in which nondisjunction is the consequence of the age-dependent movement of transposable elements. According to this model, nondisjunction is explained as the consequence of the repair of transposon-induced breaks in the DNA. Both models provide reasonable alternatives to biologically implausible explanations such as the 'production line hypothesis'.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1528
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   1ST MEIOTIC DIVISION ABNORMALITIES IN HUMAN OOCYTES - MECHANISM OF TRISOMY FORMATION [J].
ANGELL, RR ;
XIAN, J ;
KEITH, J ;
LEDGER, W ;
BAIRD, DT .
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1994, 65 (03) :194-202
[2]  
CARPENTER AT, 1973, GENETICS, V73, P393
[3]  
CARPENTER ATC, 1988, GENETIC RECOMBINATIO, P497
[4]  
EICHENLAUBRITER U, 1989, MOL CYTOGENETIC STUD
[5]   MEIOTIC GENE CONVERSION AND CROSSING OVER - THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO EACH OTHER AND TO CHROMOSOME SYNAPSIS AND SEGREGATION [J].
ENGEBRECHT, J ;
HIRSCH, J ;
ROEDER, GS .
CELL, 1990, 62 (05) :927-937
[6]  
Haines J L, 1993, Prog Clin Biol Res, V384, P51
[7]  
HASSOLD TJ, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V49, P253
[8]   YEAST GENETICS AND THE FALL OF THE CLASSICAL VIEW OF MEIOSIS [J].
HAWLEY, RS ;
ARBEL, T .
CELL, 1993, 72 (03) :301-303
[9]  
HAWLEY RS, 1993, TRENDS GENET, V9, P310
[10]  
HAWLEY RS, 1993, GENETIC RECOMBINATIO, V27, P281