THE ACCURACY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE A-AND-D TM 2421, A NEW AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING DEVICE BASED ON THE CUFF-OSCILLOMETRIC METHOD AND THE KOROTKOFF SOUND TECHNIQUE

被引：127

作者：

IMAI, Y

SASAKI, S

MINAMI, N

MUNAKATA, M

HASHIMOTO, J

SAKUMA, H

SAKUMA, M

WATANABE, N

IMAI, K

SEKINO, H

ABE, K

机构：

[1] The Second Department of Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Aobaku, Sendai, 980

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION | 1992年 / 5卷 / 10期

关键词：

AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CUFF-OSCILLOMETRIC METHOD; KOROTKOFF SOUND METHOD; OBJECTIVE RECORDING METHOD; VALIDATION;

D O I：

10.1093/ajh/5.10.719

中图分类号：

R6 [外科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100210 ;

摘要：

The accuracy and performance of the A&D TM 2421, a new ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring device using both the cuff-oscillometric method (O) and the Korotkoff sound method (K) were evaluated. The device was tested for accuracy under static and dynamic conditions by simultaneous comparison with two observers using a standard mercury column sphygmomanometer (standard method) and by the objective recording method (ORM). The performance of the device was also evaluated under ordinary ambulatory conditions. The mean differences in BP of standard method from K-method were -1.2 +/- 4.7 mm Hg systole and 1.3 +/- 4.7 mm Hg diastole (n = 323, mean +/- SD) and those of standard method from O-method were -0.4 +/- 5.3 mm Hg systole and 1.4 +/-5.1 mm Hg diastole (n = 323). The agreement between each of the two methods of the device and the standard method was within 10 mm Hg for more than 90% of both systolic and diastolic readings. During bicycle exercise, the mean differences in BP of standard method from K-method were -3.4 +/- 4.8 mm Hg systole and 1.8 +/- 5.2 mm Hg diastole (n = 71) and those of standard method from 0-method were -1.1 +/- 7.3 mm Hg systole and 1.7 +/- 7.8 mm Hg diastole (n = 67). There was a greater scatter in the individual comparisons of the device and the standard method during exercise, especially in diastolic BP. The relation between the device and ORM was almost similar to that between the device and the standard method. In 130 subjects the mean ambulatory monitoring period with the TM 2421 was 23.7 +/- 0.6 h. In the K-method the error codes (failed recordings) were given as 13.0% of measurements, while in the O-method it was 4.3%. When the data obtained by the K-method were added to the failures in the O-method, only 1% of expected recordings had failed. The results suggest that the A&D TM 2421 unit is valid for clinical and research study.

引用

页码：719 / 726

页数：8

共 14 条

[1] Tochikubo O., Minamisawa K., Miyajima E., Et al., A new compact 24-hour indirect blood pressure recorder and its clinical application, Jpn Heart J, 29, pp. 257-269, (1988)
[2] Russell A.E., Tonkin A.L., Wing L.M.H., Et al., Accuracy of the TAKEDA TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor, Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 16, pp. 253-256, (1989)
[3] Clark S., Fowlie S., Coats A., Et al., Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: Validation of the accuracy and reliability of the TM 2420 according to the AAMI recommendations, J Human Hypertens, 5, pp. 77-82, (1991)
[4] Clark S., Hofmeyr G.J., Coats A.J.S., Redman C.W.G., Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy: Validation of the TM-2420 monitor, Obstet Gynecol, 77, pp. 152-155, (1991)
[5] White W.B., Pickering T.G., Morganroth J., Et al., A multicenter evaluation of the A&D TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure recorder, Am J Hypertens, 4, pp. 890-896, (1991)
[6] Jamieson M.J., Fowler G., McDonald T.M., Et al., Bench and ambulatory field evaluation of the A & D TM-2420 automated sphygmomanometer, J Hypertens, 8, pp. 599-605, (1990)
[7] O'Brien E., Mee F., Atkins N., O'Malley K., Accuracy of the Takeda TM-2420/TM-2020 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol, J Hypertens, 9, pp. 571-572, (1991)
[8] O'Brien E., Petrie J., Littler W., Et al., The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems, J Hypertens, 8, pp. 607-619, (1990)
[9] Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation: American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers, (1987)
[10] Blank S.G., West J.E., Muller E.B., Et al., Wide band external pulse recording during cuff deflation: A new technique for evaluation of the arterial pressure pulse and measurement of blood pressure, Circulation, 77, pp. l297-1305, (1988)

← 1 2 →