H-1 AND N-15 MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ASSIGNMENTS, SECONDARY STRUCTURE, AND TERTIARY FOLD OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI DNAJ(1-78)

被引:67
作者
HILL, RB
FLANAGAN, JM
PRESTEGARD, JH
机构
[1] BROOKHAVEN NATL LAB,DEPT BIOL,UPTON,NY 11973
[2] YALE UNIV,DEPT CHEM,NEW HAVEN,CT 06520
关键词
D O I
10.1021/bi00016a033
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We report the H-1 and N-15 chemical shift assignments along with an NMR-derived preliminary structure for DnaJ(1-78), a highly conserved N-terminal domain of DnaJ, the Escherichia coli Hsp40 homolog. This 9 kDa domain is believed to cooperate with DnaK, the E. coli Hsp70 homolog, in regulating a variety of cellular functions. Heteronuclear 3D NMR experiments were carried out on a uniformly N-15-labeled DnaJ(1-78), which is a stable, folded fragment. Standard N-15-edited NMR techniques afforded complete assignment of the backbone amide H-1 and N-15 pairs and partial assignment of the side-chain H-1 and N-15 atoms. The secondary structure of DnaJ(1-78) was determined from NOE connectivities obtained from 3D N-15-separated and 2D homonuclear NOESY spectra as well as (3)J(HNH alpha), coupling constants obtained from a DQF-COSY spectrum and a N-15-edited HNHA experiment. The stability of secondary structural elements was assessed by monitoring amide exchange rates, and a model for the three-dimensional fold of these elements was derived from a set of long-range contacts extracted from homonuclear 2D NOESY experiments. The analysis indicates that DnaJ(1-78) is comprised of four alpha-helices and no beta-sheet with a short unstructured loop between antiparallel helices II and III. The shorter N-terminal and C-terminal helices make contacts with helices II and III well removed from the central loop. A discussion of how this preliminary structural model may explain mutation data from other laboratories is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:5587 / 5596
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Albani S., Tuckwell J.E., Esparza L., Carson D.A., Roudier J., J. Clin. Invest, 89, pp. 327-331, (1992)
  • [2] Andrec M., Hill R.B., Prestegard J.H., Protein Sci, (1995)
  • [3] Bardwell J.C., Till A.K., Craig E., King J., Zylicz M., Georgopoulos C., J. Biol. Chem, 261, pp. 1782-1785, (1986)
  • [4] Bax A., Davis D.G., J. Magn. Reson, 65, pp. 355-360, (1985)
  • [5] Booker G.W., Breeze A.L., Downing A.K., Panayotou G., Gout I., Waterfield M.D., Campbell I.D., Nature, 358, pp. 684-687, (1992)
  • [6] Bork P., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 2, pp. 413-421, (1992)
  • [7] Bork P., Sander C., Valencia A., Bukau B., Trends Biochem. Sci, 17, (1992)
  • [8] Brunger A.T., X-PLOR Version, (1992)
  • [9] Caplan A.J., Cyr D.M., Douglas M.G., Mol. Biol. Cell, 4, pp. 555-563, (1993)
  • [10] Cheetham M.E., Brion J.P., Anderton B.H., Biochem. J, 284, pp. 469-476, (1992)