VENOUS COMPLICATIONS OF MIDAZOLAM VERSUS DIAZEPAM

被引:18
作者
CARROUGHER, JG
KADAKIA, S
SHAFFER, RT
BARRILLEAUX, C
机构
[1] BROOKE ARMY MED CTR,GASTROENTEROL SERV,FT SAM HOUSTON,TX 78234
[2] BROOKE ARMY MED CTR,DEPT MED,FT SAM HOUSTON,TX 78234
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70113-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Although some studies have suggested fewer venous complications are associated with midazolam than with diazepam for endoscopic procedures, this variable has not been well documented. We prospectively evaluated the incidence of venous complications after intravenous injection of diazepam or midazolam in 122 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Overall, venous complications were more frequent with diazepam (22 of 62 patients) than with midazolam (4 of 60 patients) (p < 0.001). A palpable venous cord was present in 23% (14 of 62) of patients in the diazepam group, compared with 2% (1 of 60 patients) in the midazolam group (p < 0.002). Pain at the injection site occurred in 35% (22 of 62) of patients in the diazepam group compared with 7% (4 of 60 patients) in the midazolam group (p < 0.001). Swelling and warmth at the injection site were not significantly different between the two groups. Smoking, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, intravenous catheter site, dwell time of the needle, alcohol use, and pain during the injection had no effect on the incidence of venous complications.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 399
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   RESULTS FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY UNITED-STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COLLABORATIVE STUDY ON COMPLICATION RATES AND DRUG-USE DURING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
ARROWSMITH, JB ;
GERSTMAN, BB ;
FLEISCHER, DE ;
BENJAMIN, SB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (04) :421-427
[2]   MIDAZOLAM VERSUS DIAZEPAM FOR COMBINED ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY AND COLONOSCOPY [J].
BROUILLETTE, DE ;
LEVENTHAL, R ;
KUMAR, S ;
BERMAN, D ;
KAJANI, M ;
YOO, YK ;
CARRA, J ;
TARTER, R ;
VANTHIEL, DH .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1989, 34 (08) :1265-1271
[3]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF INTRAVENOUS DIAZEPAM AND MIDAZOLAM FOR ORAL-SURGERY [J].
CLARK, RNW ;
RODRIGO, MRC .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1986, 44 (11) :860-863
[4]   MIDAZOLAM, A NEW MORE POTENT BENZODIAZEPINE, COMPARED WITH DIAZEPAM - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF PREENDOSCOPIC SEDATIVES [J].
COLE, SG ;
BROZINSKY, S ;
ISENBERG, JI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1983, 29 (03) :219-222
[5]   MIDAZOLAM IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY - A CROSSOVER TRIAL [J].
DIXON, RA ;
KENYON, C ;
MARSH, DRG ;
THORNTON, JA .
ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (03) :276-281
[6]   DIAZEPAM MIXED MICELLE - COMPARISON WITH DIAZEPAM IN PROPYLENE-GLYCOL AND MIDAZOLAM [J].
GALLETLY, DC ;
WILSON, LF ;
TREUREN, BC ;
BOON, BP .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1985, 13 (04) :352-354
[7]  
GELFMAN SS, 1981, ANAESTH PROG, V5, P126
[8]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM [J].
LEE, MG ;
HANNA, W ;
HARDING, H .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (02) :82-84
[9]   DIAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM (VERSED) IN OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
LEWIS, BS ;
SHLIEN, RD ;
WAYE, JD ;
KNIGHT, RJ ;
ALDOROTY, RA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (01) :33-36
[10]   VENOUS COMPLICATIONS OF INTRAVENOUS DIAZEPAM [J].
LITCHFIELD, NB .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1983, 41 (11) :701-705