ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON AND QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORS

被引:145
作者
DAVEY, DD
NARYSHKIN, S
NIELSEN, ML
KLINE, TS
机构
[1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky
[2] Department of Pathology, Mercy Hospital, Janesville, Wisconsin
[3] Pathology Consultants, Inc, Wichita and the Department of Pathology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas
[4] Department of Pathology, Lankenau Hospital, Philadelphia
关键词
ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS; ASCUS; BETHESDA SYSTEM; INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON;
D O I
10.1002/dc.2840110416
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The Bethesda System recognizes ''Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance'' (ASCUS) as a category of epithelial cell abnormality. Neither the acceptable rare of ASCUS nor the clinical follow-up are well defined This study focused on interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance methods for evaluating the rate and outcome of ASCUS. Data was collected from questionnaire surveys from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory PAP Program and the four authors' laboratories, Most PAP laboratories (82.5%) limit the use of ''atypia'' terminology to abnormalities of undetermined significance. According to PAP data, the median rate of ASCUS in 1992 was 2.9%, with 10% of laboratories reporting rates greater than 9.0%. The median squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) rare was 2.2%, with a median ASCUS/SIL ratio of 1.3. The authors' laboratories (university, independent, and hospital) revealed ASCUS rates of 1.6-9.0%, while SIL rates were 2.1-9.0%. The ASCUS/SIL ratio was less variable, 0.8-2.7. Follow-up of ASCUS patients in the authors' laboratories showed 10.3-43% with SIL, but less than 6% with high grade SIL. The ratio ASCUS/SIL may serve as a useful laboratory monitor, Peer review and follow-up studies of ASCUS serve to validate laboratory criteria and consequent clinical follow-up. Communication with clinicians is vital in ensuring optimal patient care. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 396
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal diagnoses, J Am Med Assoc, 262, pp. 931-934, (1989)
  • [2] Kurman RJ, Solomon D., The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses, pp. 30-43, (1994)
  • [3] Kurman RJ, Henson DE, Herbst AL, Noller KL, Schiffman MH, Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology, J Am Med Assoc, 271, pp. 1866-1869, (1994)
  • [4] Saminathan T, Lahoti C, Kannan V, Kline TS, Postmenopausal squamous‐cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge, Diagn Cytopathol, 11, pp. 226-230, (1994)
  • [5] Davis GL, Hernandez E, Davis JL, Miyazawa K., Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears, Obstet Gynecol, 69, pp. 43-46, (1987)
  • [6] Jones DED, Creasman WT, Dombroski RA, Lentz SS, Waeltz JL, Evaluation of the atypical Pap smear, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 157, pp. 544-549, (1987)
  • [7] Noumoff JS, Atypia in cervical cytology as a risk factor for intraepithelial neoplasia, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 156, pp. 628-631, (1987)
  • [8] Soutter WP, Wisdom S, Brough AK, Monoghan JM, Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colpos‐copy?, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 93, pp. 70-74, (1986)
  • [9] Busseniers AE, Sidawy MK, Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears: a diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist, J Reprod Med, 36, pp. 85-88, (1991)
  • [10] Kohan S, Noumoff J, Beckman EM, Morris M, Weiner E, Douglas GW, Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears, J Reprod Med, 30, pp. 383-387, (1985)