RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ORAL ATENOLOL IN PATIENTS WITH UNEXPLAINED SYNCOPE AND POSITIVE UPRIGHT TILT-TABLE TEST-RESULTS

被引:117
作者
MAHANONDA, N [1 ]
BHURIPANYO, K [1 ]
KANGKAGATE, C [1 ]
WANSANIT, K [1 ]
KULCHOT, B [1 ]
NADEMANEE, K [1 ]
CHAITHIRAPHAN, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SO CALIF,DIV CARDIOL,LOS ANGELES,CA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0002-8703(95)90150-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of this investigation was the assessment of the response rate of oral atenolol in patients with vasovagal syncope after 1 month of treatment. We randomized into two groups all patients referred to our unit who had had at least one episode of syncope or two episodes of presyncope 1 month before presentation and had a positive isuprel Tilt Table Test (TTT). Group 1 (Gr 1) received oral atenolol, and group 2 (Gr 2) received placebo medication. After a 1-month period patients were reassessed for degree of their symptoms and underwent repeated TTT. Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Gr 1 and Gr 2 were comparable in age (38 +/- 13 years vs 43 +/- 14 years, p = 0.216 and sex (male/female = 6:15 vs 10:11, p = 0.204). The severity of attack was similar in both groups. Eight patients in Gr 1 and six patients in Gr 2 had mitral valve prolapse (p = 0.5). No significant differences were seen in systolic blood pressure (122 +/- 17 vs 117 +/- 16 mm Hg, p = 0.334), diastolic blood pressure (70 +/- 11 vs 72 +/- 11 mm Hg, p = 0.677), and heart rate (79 +/- 12 vs 79 +/- 13, p = 0.98) between the two groups. The response rates (negative TTT) after 1 month of treatment were 62% versus 5% (p = 0.0004) in the atenolol and control group, respectively. Moreover, patients who received atenolol reported feeling better compared with those who received placebo (71% vs 29%, p = 0.02). In conclusion, atenolol significantly improved symptoms of patients with vasovagal syncope. Patients who received atenolol were more likely to have negative isuprel TTT.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1253
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Almquist, Goldenberg, Milstein, Chen, Chen, Hansen, Gornick, Benditt, Provocation of Bradycardia and Hypotension by Isoproterenol and Upright Posture in Patients with Unexplained Syncope, New England Journal of Medicine, 320, pp. 346-351, (1980)
[2]  
Kapoor, Diagnostic evaluation of syncope, Am J Med, 90, pp. 91-106, (1991)
[3]  
Raviele', Gasparini, Delise, Bonso, Piccolo, Usefulness of head-up tilt test in evaluating patients with syncope of unknown origin and negative electrophysiologic study, The American Journal of Cardiology, 65, pp. 1322-1327, (1990)
[4]  
Kligfield, Tilt table for the investigation of syncope: there is nothing simple about fainting, J Am Coll Cardiol, 17, pp. 131-132, (1991)
[5]  
Abi-Samra, Maloney, Fouad-Tarazi, Castle, The usefulness of head-tilt testing and hemodynamic investigations in the work up of syncope of unknown origin, PACE, 11, pp. 1202-1214, (1988)
[6]  
Elder, Upright tilt-table testing and drug therapy for recurrent vasovagal syncope, Ann Pharmacol, 26, pp. 786-788, (1991)
[7]  
Sheldon, Killium, Methodology of isoproterenol tilt-table testing in patients with syncope, J Am Coll Cardiol, 17, pp. 131-132, (1992)
[8]  
Grubb, Temesy-Armos, Moore, Wolfe, Hahn, Ellot, Head-upright tilt-table testing in evaluation and management of the malignant vasovagal syndrome, Am J Cardiol, 69, pp. 904-908, (1992)
[9]  
Wayne, Syncope: physiological considerations and an analysis of the clinical characteristics in 510 patients, Am J Med, 30, pp. 418-438, (1961)
[10]  
Kapoor, Karpf, Wiend, Peterson, Levey, A prospective evaluation and follow up of patients with syncope, N Engl J Med, 309, pp. 197-204, (1983)