FATE OF CLINICALLY INSIGNIFICANT RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS AFTER EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY WITH EDAP LT-01 LITHOTRIPTER

被引：37

作者：

MOON, YT ^{[1
]}

KIM, SC ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] CHUNG ANG UNIV,COLL MED,DEPT UROL,SEOUL,SOUTH KOREA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY | 1993年 / 7卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1089/end.1993.7.453

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病）];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

The stone-free rate of 248 cases of clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) was 32.7% by 1 month, 73.0% by 3 months, and 92.7% by 6 months of follow-up. The stone-free rate decreased but not remarkably in accordance with the increment of the caliceal dilatation (92.9%, 94.9%, 85.7%, and 83.3% for no, mild, moderate, and severe dilatation, respectively) by 6 months of follow-up. The clearance of the CIRF was not influenced by their location, the pelviocaliceal angle, the infundibular length, or the number of the lower calices. Of 16 patients who had residual stone fragments at 6 months and underwent an additional session of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), 12 became stone free by another 6 months of follow-up. Therefore, it is desirable to wait for clearance of CIRF for at least 6 months before offering further treatment, regardless of their location and anatomic variation of the calices containing CLRF. Repeated SWL, even for stone fragments of 3 to 4 mm in diameter found initially 1 month after the last session of SWL, might promote clearance of the CIRF, and additional SWL for persistent CIRF could be an appropriate adjunctive measure.

引用

页码：453 / 456

页数：4

共 19 条

[1]

Chaussy C., Schmiedt E., Jocham D., Et al., First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves, J Urol, 127, (1982)

[2]

Chaussy C., Brendel W., Schmiedt E., Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves, Lancet, 2, (1980)

[3]

Lingeman J.E., Newman D., Mertz J.H.O., Et al., Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience, J Urol, 135, (1986)

[4]

Drach G.W., Dretler S., Fair W., Et al., Report of the United States Cooperative Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, J Urol, 135, (1986)

[5]

Lingeman J.E., Smith L.H., Woods J.R., Et al., Bioeffects and longterm results of ESWL, pp. 273-292, (1989)

[6]

Liedl B., Jocham D., Lunz C., Et al., Five-year follow-up of urinary stone patients treated with extracorporeal shock were lithotripsy, J Endourol, 2, (1988)

[7]

Newman D.M., Scott J.W., Lingeman J.E., Two-year follow-up of patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J Endourol, 2, (1988)

[8]

Rhiehle R.A., Fair W.R., Vaughan E.D., Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi: one year's experience at a single center, JAMA, 255, (1986)

[9]

Newman D.M., Scott J.W., Long-term follow-up of 2,617 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients, J Urol, 137, (1987)

[10]

McDougall E.M., Denstedt J.D., Brown R.D., Et al., Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal calculi in lower pole calices, J Endourol, 3, (1989)

← 1 2 →