SHAPE DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF EIGENVALUES USING EXACT NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF FINITE-ELEMENT MATRICES

被引:41
作者
LUND, E
OLHOFF, N
机构
[1] Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, DK-9220
来源
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION | 1994年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01742934
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
As has been shown in recent years, the approximate numerical differentiation of element stiffness matrices which is inherent in the semi-analytical method of finite element based design sensitivity analysis, may give rise to severely erroneous shape design sensitivities in static problems involving linearly elastic bending of beam, plate and shell structures. This paper demonstrates that the error problem also manifests itself in semi-analytical sensitivity analyses of eigenvalues of such structures and presents a method for complete elimination of the error problem. The method, which yields ''exact' numerical sensitivities on the basis of simple first-order numerical differentiation, is computationally inexpensive and easy to implement as an integral part of the finite element analysis. The method is presented in terms of semi-analytical shape design sensitivity analysis of eigenvalues in the form of frequencies of free transverse vibrations of plates modelled by isoparametric Mindlin finite elements. Finally, the development is illustrated via two examples of occurrence of the error phenomenon when the traditional method is used and it is shown that the problem is completely eliminated by the application of the new method.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Barthelemy B., Haftka R.T., Accuracy analysis of the semianalytical method for shape sensitivity analysis, Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 18, pp. 407-432, (1990)
[2]  
Bratus A.S., Seyranian A.P., Bimodal solutions in eigenvalue optimization problems, Prikl. Matem. Mekhan., 47, pp. 546-554, (1983)
[3]  
Cheng G., Gu Y., Zhou Y., Accuracy of semi-analytical sensitivity analysis, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 6, pp. 113-128, (1989)
[4]  
Cheng G., Liu Y., A new computational scheme for sensitivity analysis, Eng. Opt., 12, pp. 219-235, (1987)
[5]  
Cheng G., Olhoff N., Rigid body motion test against error in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis, Comp. & Struct., 46, pp. 515-527, (1993)
[6]  
Courant R., Hilbert D., Methods of mathematical physics, (Volume 1), (1953)
[7]  
Fenyes P.A., Lust R.V., Error analysis of semi-analytical displacement derivatives for shape and sizing variables, AIAA J., 29, pp. 271-279, (1991)
[8]  
Haftka R.T., Adelman H.M., Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis, Struct. Optim., 1, pp. 137-151, (1989)
[9]  
Haug E.J., Choi K.K., Komkov V., Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems, (1986)
[10]  
Mlejnek H.P., Accuracy of semi-analytical sensitivities and its improvement by the “natural method”, Struct. Optim., 4, pp. 128-131, (1992)