COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHY

被引:118
作者
GLUER, CC [1 ]
STEIGER, P [1 ]
SELVIDGE, R [1 ]
ELLIESENKLIEFOTH, K [1 ]
HAYASHI, C [1 ]
GENANT, HK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT RADIOL,POB 0628,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
Bones; absorptiometry; 331.1299; 443.1299; CT; 331.1211; mineralization; radiography; 331.129; 443.1295; Computed tomography (CT); comparative studies; Hip; 443.1211; Osteoporosis; 30.56; 40.56;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.174.1.2294552
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Dual-energy bone densitometry can be performed with two types of scanners. The traditional dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) machines use an isotope source, whereas the newly introduced dual-energy radiography (DER) devices use an incorporated x-ray tube. The authors evaluated the performance of DPA and DER devices at their institution. The short-term precision error in vivo was 1.2% for femoral neck measurements with DER. Long-term precision error in vitro was reduced from 1.30% (DPA) to 0.44% (DER). The scanning time for both spine and hip measurements was reduced from 20-40 minutes to 6-7 minutes. Intraosseous fat sensitivity remained the same, at a level of 12 mg/cm2 apparent decrease of bone mineral density (BMD) per 10% fat by volume change, and for both devices there was no shift in BMD when phantom thickness was increased by 1.5 inches. The correlation of DPA and DER was high: r = .98 for the spine and r = .95 for the femoral neck. Correlation of DPA versus quantitative computed tomography (CT) (r = .83) and DER versus quantitative CT (r = .85) was good. The advent of DER represents a significant advance for the field of bone densitometry.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 228
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ALFFRAM P, 1965, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND S, V65, P9
[2]   QUANTITATIVE DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHIC ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - INVIVO COMPARISON WITH DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
BORDERS, J ;
KERR, E ;
SARTORIS, DJ ;
STEIN, JA ;
RAMOS, E ;
MOSCONA, AA ;
RESNICK, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (01) :129-131
[3]   SHOULD PERIMENOPAUSAL WOMEN BE SCREENED FOR OSTEOPOROSIS [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
BLACK, D .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 104 (06) :817-823
[4]  
DALEN N, 1974, INVEST RADIOL, V9, P174
[5]   CORRECTION OF THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE, SOURCE STRENGTH, AND SOFT-TISSUE THICKNESS ON SPINE DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS [J].
DAWSONHUGHES, B ;
DEEHR, MS ;
BERGER, PS ;
DALLAL, GE ;
SADOWSKI, LJ .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (04) :251-257
[6]   QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF VERTEBRAL SPONGIOSA - A SENSITIVE METHOD FOR DETECTING EARLY BONE LOSS AFTER OOPHORECTOMY [J].
GENANT, HK ;
CANN, CE ;
ETTINGER, B ;
GORDAN, GS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1982, 97 (05) :699-705
[7]  
GENANT HK, 1989, APR EUR SOC CLIN INV
[8]   X-RAY SPECTROPHOTOMETRY FOR BONE MINERAL DETERMINATIONS [J].
GUSTAFSSON, L ;
JACOBSON, B ;
KUSOFFSKY, L .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1974, 12 (01) :113-119
[9]  
HANSON J, 1987, J BONE MINER RES S1, V2, P204
[10]  
JACOBSON B, 1964, AMER J ROENTGENOL RA, V91, P202