TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY

被引:265
作者
BRASILNETO, JP
MCSHANE, LM
FUHR, P
HALLETT, M
COHEN, LG
机构
[1] NINCDS, MED NEUROL BRANCH,HUMAN MOTOR CONTROL SECT, HUMAN CORTICAL PHYSIOL UNIT,BLDG 10, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
[2] NINCDS, BIOMETRY & FIELD STUDIES BRANCH, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1992年 / 85卷 / 01期
关键词
MAPPING; MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/0168-5597(92)90095-S
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from deltoid, biceps brachii, abductor pollicis brevis and flexor carpi radialis muscles of 5 normal volunteers during transcranial magnetic stimulation. With the subjects at rest, an 8-shaped magnetic coil was used to deliver 30 stimuli to different scalp positions 0.5 or 1.0 cm apart. The variability in amplitude and latency of MEPs was studied as a function of the scalp position stimulated, the number of stimuli at each position, and the percentage of maximal peripheral M responses (%M) elicited. The results were used to estimate the optimal number of stimuli at each position and the optimal spacing of scalp positions for topographic mapping of the human motor cortex. The amplitude and latency variability of MEPs were higher when suboptimal scalp positions were stimulated. Consequently, a larger number of stimuli were required to determine representative MEP amplitudes at suboptimal positions. In addition, there was an inverse relationship between %M recruited by transcranial magnetic stimuli in different subjects and the variability in MEP amplitude and latency. Latency variability was less pronounced than amplitude variability. Optimal sampling conditions are required to produce the best topographic maps, particularly to show subtle reorganization patterns in the human motor cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Impulses in the pyramidal tract [J].
Adrian, ED ;
Moruzzi, G .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1939, 97 (02) :153-199
[2]  
AMASSIAN VE, 1990, MAGNETIC STIMULATION
[3]  
BENECKE R, 1991, EXP BRAIN RES, V83, P419
[4]   On the instability of a cortical point. [J].
Brown, TG ;
Sherrington, CS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-CONTAINING PAPERS OF A BIOLOGICAL CHARACTER, 1912, 85 (579) :250-277
[5]   ROBUST LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION AND SMOOTHING SCATTERPLOTS [J].
CLEVELAND, WS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) :829-836
[6]  
Cochran W.G, 1957, STAT METHODS, V6th ed
[7]   LEG PARESTHESIAS INDUCED BY MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH THORACIC SPINAL-CORD INJURY [J].
COHEN, LG ;
TOPKA, H ;
COLE, RA ;
HALLETT, M .
NEUROLOGY, 1991, 41 (08) :1283-1288
[8]  
COHEN LG, 1991, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V438, pP33
[9]   CONGENITAL MIRROR MOVEMENTS - ABNORMAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR PATHWAYS IN 2 PATIENTS [J].
COHEN, LG ;
MEER, J ;
TARKKA, I ;
BIERNER, S ;
LEIDERMAN, DB ;
DUBINSKY, RM ;
SANES, JN ;
JABBARI, B ;
BRANSCUM, B ;
HALLETT, M .
BRAIN, 1991, 114 :381-403
[10]   MOTOR REORGANIZATION AFTER UPPER LIMB AMPUTATION IN MAN - A STUDY WITH FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION [J].
COHEN, LG ;
BANDINELLI, S ;
FINDLEY, TW ;
HALLETT, M .
BRAIN, 1991, 114 :615-627