Managing demand uncertainty through order overplanning

被引:35
作者
Bartezzaghi, E
Verganti, R
机构
[1] Dipartimento di Economia e Produzione, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano
关键词
demand uncertainty; lumpy demand; overplanning; subjective forecasts; master production scheduling;
D O I
10.1016/0925-5273(95)00047-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Most techniques for managing demand uncertainty require a certain degree of stability in the environment, since they are completely or partially based on the observation of historical data. When applied to a context characterized by irregular and sporadic demand these techniques show poor performances. In fact, in such a case uncertainty management calls for the gathering of information that directly anticipates future requirements. Although contexts with irregular and sporadic demand have received only minor attention in the past, they are currently gaining ever more importance and extending their occurrence. This paper illustrates and discusses a method, called order overplanning, specifically designed to cope with uncertainty in these environments. It consists of an articulate and coherent set of forecasting procedures, planning principles and slack control techniques. From a Master Production Scheduling (MPS) perspective, order overplanning is similar to hedging and option overplanning: gross requirements are larger than expected demand. The major difference is that order overplanning uses two distinct units in the MPS and forecasting procedures: while the MPS unit is an end item or a module, the forecasting unit is a customer order. This makes order overplanning able to exploit early information generated by each customer during its purchasing process, information that otherwise would be lost. This marked advantage comes to the detriment of an increased effort of integration between Sales and Manufacturing, especially for controlling the slack created to handle uncertainty. The paper first infers the principles and procedures of order overplanning by analysing the case study of an Italian telecommunications manufacturer. Then, it discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of this method, in order to identify the main factors affecting its performances and to determine the planning environments where it fits coherently.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 120
页数:14
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A TECHNIQUE FOR UNCERTAINTY REDUCTION BASED ORDER COMMONALITY [J].
BARTEZZAGHI, E ;
VERGANTI, R .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1995, 6 (02) :157-169
[2]  
FISHER ML, 1994, HARVARD BUSINESS MAY, P83
[3]   THE DYNAMICS OF HEDGING THE MASTER SCHEDULE [J].
GUERRERO, HH ;
BAKER, KR ;
SOUTHARD, MH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (06) :1475-1483
[4]  
Ho C.-J., 1993, Production Planning and Control, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/09537289308919453
[5]   ON THE DETERMINATION OF OVERPLANNING MARGINS FOR COMPONENTS IN A CONSUMER ELECTRONICS FACTORY [J].
KAMP, APGM ;
POLDERMAN, GL ;
STRIEKWOLD, PET ;
WEEDA, PJ .
ENGINEERING COSTS AND PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1989, 16 (03) :183-193
[6]   FORECASTING USING PARTIALLY KNOWN DEMANDS [J].
KEKRE, S ;
MORTON, TE ;
SMUNT, TL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1990, 6 (01) :115-125
[7]  
KNEPPELT LR, 1984, 1ST PROD INV M, P83
[8]  
Mather H, 1988, COMPETITIVE MANUFACT
[9]  
METTERS RD, 1993, PROD INV M J, P61
[10]  
MILLER JG, 1982, DISAGGREGATION PROBL, P237