Conflict of interest in psychiatry

被引:16
作者
Ahmer, Syed [1 ]
Arya, Pradeep [2 ]
Anderson, Duncan [3 ]
Faruqui, Rafey [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tony HillisWing West London Mental Hlth NHS Trust, Gen Adult Psychiat, Uxbridge Rd, Southall UB1 3EU, Middx, England
[2] St Charles Hosp, St Marys Higher Training Scheme Psychiat, Gen Adult Psychiat, Jefferson, NY 11777 USA
[3] West London Mental Hlth NHS Trust, Bridges Medium Secure Unit 3, Forens Psychiat, Southall, Middx, England
[4] West London Mental Hlth NHS Trust, Gen Adult Psychiat, Southall, Middx, England
[5] Imperial Coll London, London, England
来源
PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN | 2005年 / 29卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1192/pb.29.8.302
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
AIMS AND METHOD To study the association between study support and outcome in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotropic drugs, we reviewed all RCTs published in four psychiatry journals over a 5-year period. Chi-squared tests were used to analyse the association between RCT support and outcome, and logistic regression to determine which variable best predicted outcome. RESULTS A significantly higher proportion of manufacturer-supported RCTs (125/138, 91%, 95% CI 88-93) had a positive outcome than non-manufacturer-supported RCTs (39/50, 78%, 95% CI 72-84; P=0.02). Having an employee author almost guaranteed a positive outcome (56/58, 97%, 95% CI 94-99). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Outcomes of drug RCTs have a significant association with support by the manufacturer of the experimental drug. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on these RCTs may be biased in favour of newer drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 304
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V323, P651
[2]   Influences on the quality of published drug studies [J].
Bero, LA ;
Rennie, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 12 (02) :209-237
[3]   Withholding research results in academic life science - Evidence from a national survey of faculty [J].
Blumenthal, D ;
Campbell, EG ;
Anderson, MS ;
Causino, N ;
Louis, KS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (15) :1224-1228
[4]   SOURCE OF FUNDING AND OUTCOME OF CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DAVIDSON, RA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 1 (03) :155-158
[5]   Predictive value of pharmacological activity for the relative efficacy of antidepressant drugs - Meta-regression analysis [J].
Freemantle, N ;
Anderson, IM ;
Young, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 177 :292-302
[6]   Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology [J].
Friedberg, M ;
Saffran, B ;
Stinson, TJ ;
Nelson, W ;
Bennett, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1453-1457
[7]   MULTIPLE PUBLICATION OF REPORTS OF DRUG TRIALS [J].
GOTZSCHE, PC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 36 (05) :429-432
[8]   Acknowledgement of psychiatric research funding [J].
Henderson, C ;
Howard, L ;
Wilkinson, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 183 :273-275
[9]   Redundancy, disaggregation, and the integrity of medical research [J].
Huston, P ;
Moher, D .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9007) :1024-1026
[10]   Problems in the design and reporting of trials of antifungal agents encountered during meta-analysis [J].
Johansen, HK ;
Gotzsche, PC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (18) :1752-1759