CORRELATION BETWEEN MICTURITIONAL URETHRAL PRESSURE PROFILE AND PRESSURE-FLOW CRITERIA IN BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION

被引:24
作者
DUBEAU, CE
SULLIVAN, MP
CRAVALHO, E
RESNICK, NM
YALLA, SV
机构
[1] BROCKTON W ROXBURY VET ADM MED CTR, CTR GERIATR RES EDUC & CLIN, BOSTON, MA USA
[2] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, DIV GERONTOL, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[3] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, DIV UROL, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[4] HARVARD UNIV, MIT, HEBREW REHABIL CTR AGED, DIV HLTH SCI & TECHNOL, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[5] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
关键词
URODYNAMICS; BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION; PROSTATE HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67085-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We correlate micturitional urethral pressure profilometry with pressure-flow diagnoses of outlet obstruction. Materials and Methods: Urodynamic evaluation was done of 86 consecutive men with voiding symptoms. Obstruction criteria were a micturitional urethral pressure profile (MUPP) gradient greater than 5 cm. water, Schafer's linear passive urethral resistance relation (PURR) greater than grade 1 and Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. Results: Interpretable results were completed in 99% of the patients undergoing MUPP and 60% undergoing pressure-flow studies (p < 0.00001). MUPP diagnosis agreed with PURR (p = 0.0015) and Abrams-Griffiths nomogram results (p = 0.00004). MUPP gradients correlated well with PURR (r = 0.70, p < 0.00001). Using optimum cutoff values (11 cm. water), the sensitivity of MUPP was 83%, specificity 82% and positive predictive value 94%. Conclusions: MUPP correlates well with and yields interpretable results more often than pressure-flow studies.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 503
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abrams P, 1988, Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl, V114, P5
[2]   ASSESSMENT OF PROSTATIC OBSTRUCTION FROM URODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS AND FROM RESIDUAL URINE [J].
ABRAMS, PH ;
GRIFFITHS, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1979, 51 (02) :129-134
[3]  
ASKLIN B, 1984, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, V18, P269, DOI 10.3109/00365598409180195
[4]   PROSTATISM - RATIONALIZATION OF URODYNAMIC TESTING [J].
COOLSAET, BLRA ;
VANVENROOIJ, GEPM ;
BLOK, C .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 2 (03) :216-221
[5]   COMPARISON OF PRESSURE-FLOW STUDIES WITH MICTURITIONAL URETHRAL PRESSURE PROFILES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF URINARY OUTFLOW OBSTRUCTION [J].
DESMOND, AD ;
RAMAYYA, GR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 61 (03) :224-229
[6]   A METHOD OF ADJUSTMENT OF MALE PEAK URINARY FLOW-RATE FOR VARYING AGE AND VOLUME VOIDED [J].
DRACH, GW ;
LAYTON, T ;
BOTTACCINI, MR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 128 (05) :960-962
[7]  
DUBEAU CE, 1992, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V11, P372
[8]   CONTROVERSIES ABOUT INDICATIONS FOR TRANS-URETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE [J].
GRAVERSEN, PH ;
GASSER, TC ;
WASSON, JH ;
HINMAN, F ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (03) :475-481
[9]   MAXIMUM URINARY FLOW-RATE BY UROFLOWMETRY - AUTOMATIC OR VISUAL INTERPRETATION [J].
GRINO, PB ;
BRUSKEWITZ, R ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
SIROKY, MB ;
ANDERSEN, JT ;
COOK, T ;
STONER, E .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (02) :339-341
[10]   MAXIMUM AND AVERAGE URINE FLOW-RATES IN NORMAL-MALE AND FEMALE POPULATIONS - THE LIVERPOOL NOMOGRAMS [J].
HAYLEN, BT ;
ASHBY, D ;
SUTHERST, JR ;
FRAZER, MI ;
WEST, CR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 64 (01) :30-38