PURPOSES OF PUNISHMENT - EFFECTS OF UTILITIES OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS ON PERCEIVED APPROPRIATENESS

[1] [Anonymous], 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT

[2] USE OF NONLINEAR, NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS IN DECISION MAKING [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 73 (03) : 221 - 230

[3] Ezorsky G, 1972, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES

[4] REDUCTION OF CRIMINAL SENTENCES ON APPEAL: I [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1937, 37 (04) : 521 - 556

[5] SOCIAL CONSENSUS ON NORMS OF JUSTICE - SHOULD THE PUNISHMENT FIT THE CRIME [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1980, 85 (05) : 1117 - 1144

[6] Hammond K. R., 1975, HUMAN JUDGMENT DECIS

[7] Hart H., 1968, PUNISHMENT RESPONSIB, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.003.0006

[8] Hogarth J., 1971, SENTENCING HUMAN PRO

[9] MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY MODELS - REVIEW OF FIELD AND FIELD-LIKE STUDIES [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1974, 20 (10): : 1393 - 1402

[10] Keeney R., 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O

[1] [Anonymous], 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT

[2] USE OF NONLINEAR, NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS IN DECISION MAKING [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1970, 73 (03) : 221 - 230

[3] Ezorsky G, 1972, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES

[4] REDUCTION OF CRIMINAL SENTENCES ON APPEAL: I [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1937, 37 (04) : 521 - 556

[5] SOCIAL CONSENSUS ON NORMS OF JUSTICE - SHOULD THE PUNISHMENT FIT THE CRIME [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1980, 85 (05) : 1117 - 1144

[6] Hammond K. R., 1975, HUMAN JUDGMENT DECIS

[7] Hart H., 1968, PUNISHMENT RESPONSIB, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.003.0006

[8] Hogarth J., 1971, SENTENCING HUMAN PRO

[9] MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY MODELS - REVIEW OF FIELD AND FIELD-LIKE STUDIES [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1974, 20 (10): : 1393 - 1402

[10] Keeney R., 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O