THE EFFECTS OF VISUAL-FIELD SIZE ON HEMISPHERIC-ASYMMETRY OF PATTERN REVERSAL VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS

被引:13
作者
MECACCI, L
SPINELLI, D
VIGGIANO, MP
机构
[1] Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi La Sapienza Roma
关键词
Experimental scotomata; Field size; Handedness; Hemispheric asymmetry; VEPs;
D O I
10.3109/00207459009000517
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in 17 females (10 right-handers and 7 left-handers) and 17 males (10 right-handers and 7 left-handers). The stimulus was a checkerboard pattern phase-reversed at a rate of 1 Hz, binocularly viewed by the subject. Two experimental conditions were tested: field size (the stimulus was enlarged from 1 to 30° of visual angle) and occlusion (the central part of the stimulus was occluded by experimental scotomata of various size-from 1 to 16° Responses recorded at occipital and temporal leads of the two hemispheres were compared. The P100-N 145 amplitude was larger at occipital than at temporal leads, it augmented increasing the size of the stimulus and diminished occluding progressively larger portions of the central field. Hemispheric asymmetries emerged with large field sizes and were not abolished by the presence of experimental scotomata. The hemispheric asymmetry was related to handedness (left-handers had larger amplitudes in the right hemisphere, right-handers in the left hemisphere), but not to sex. Hemispheric asymmetries in VEPs latency were not present. In comparison to males, females showed larger amplitudes and shorter latencies. These results point out that hemispheric asymmetries are found also for the processing of elementary visual stimuli like checkerboards, and they depend both on stimulus parameters (field size) and subject variables (handedness). © 1990 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 151
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   PARADOX IN LATERALIZATION OF VISUAL EVOKED-RESPONSE [J].
BARRETT, G ;
BLUMHARDT, L ;
HALLIDAY, AM ;
HALLIDAY, E ;
KRISS, A .
NATURE, 1976, 261 (5557) :253-255
[2]  
BLUMENHARDT LD, 1979, EXP BRAIN RES, V36, P53
[3]   ASYMMETRICAL VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL TO PATTERN REVERSAL IN ONE HALF-FIELD AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR ANALYSIS OF VISUAL-FIELD DEFECTS [J].
BLUMHARDT, LD ;
BARRETT, G ;
HALLIDAY, AM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1977, 61 (07) :454-461
[4]   EFFECT OF EXPERIMENTAL SCOTOMATA ON IPSILATERAL AND CONTRALATERAL RESPONSES TO PATTERN-REVERSAL IN ONE HALF-FIELD [J].
BLUMHARDT, LD ;
BARRETT, G ;
HALLIDAY, AM ;
KRISS, A .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 45 (03) :376-392
[5]   PATTERN REVERSAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS - AGE, SEX AND HEMISPHERIC-ASYMMETRY [J].
COHN, NB ;
KIRCHER, J ;
EMMERSON, RY ;
DUSTMAN, RE .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (06) :399-405
[6]   CORTICAL RESPONSES TO STIMULATION OF HUMAN FOVEA [J].
DEVOE, RG ;
RIPPS, H ;
VAUGHAN, HG .
VISION RESEARCH, 1968, 8 (02) :135-&
[7]   EFFECT OF CENTRAL SCOTOMAS ON PATTERN REVERSAL VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN PATIENTS WITH MACULOPATHY AND HEALTHY-SUBJECTS [J].
FUKUI, R ;
KATO, M ;
KUROIWA, Y .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 63 (04) :317-326
[8]  
GRONEBERG A, 1980, DOCUMENTA OPHTHAL P, V23, P255
[9]   HEMI-FIELD PATTERN REVERSAL VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS .1. NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
HAIMOVIC, IC ;
PEDLEY, TA .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 54 (02) :111-120
[10]   VARIABILITY ON SERIAL TESTING OF PATTERN REVERSAL VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL LATENCIES FROM FULL-FIELD, HALF-FIELD AND FOVEAL STIMULATION IN CONTROL SUBJECTS [J].
HAMMOND, SR ;
MACCALLUM, S ;
YIANNIKAS, C ;
WALSH, JC ;
MCLEOD, JG .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (04) :401-408