INDUCTION AND RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOFOL, THIOPENTAL AND ETOMIDATE

被引：41

作者：

BOYSEN, K

SANCHEZ, R

KRINTEL, JJ

HANSEN, M

HAAR, PM

DYRBERG, V

机构：

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb02993.x

中图分类号：

R614 [麻醉学];

学科分类号：

100217 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：689 / 692

页数：4

共 10 条

[1] GRANT IS, 1985, POSTGRAD MED J, V61, P133
[2] WHICH INTRAVENOUS INDUCTION AGENT FOR DAY SURGERY - A COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL, THIOPENTONE, METHOHEXITONE AND ETOMIDATE
HEATH, PJ
KENNEDY, DJ
OGG, TW
DUNLING, C
GILKS, WR
[J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 43 (05) : 365 - 368
[3] HELBOHANSEN S, 1988, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V32, P502
[4] KAY B, 1985, POSTGRAD MED J, V61, P108
[5] AMINOPHYLLINE REDUCES THE DEPTH AND DURATION OF SEDATION WITH BARBITURATES
KRINTEL, JJ
WEGMANN, F
[J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 31 (04) : 352 - 354
[6] COMPARISON OF INDUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF 4 INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENTS
MCCOLLUM, JSC
DUNDEE, JW
[J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (10) : 995 - 1000
[7] MCLEOD B, 1985, POSTGRAD MED J, V61, P105
[8] SIKH SS, 1979, ANESTH ANALG, V58, P324
[9] STARK RD, 1985, POSTGRAD MED J, V61, P152
[10] SIMPLIFIED SCORING SYSTEM FOR POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY ROOM
STEWARD, DJ
[J]. CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1975, 22 (01) : 111 - 113