COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF PRECONCEPTION CARE FOR WOMEN WITH ESTABLISHED DIABETES-MELLITUS

被引:73
作者
ELIXHAUSER, A
WESCHLER, JM
KITZMILLER, JL
MARKS, JS
BENNERT, HW
COUSTAN, DR
GABBE, SG
HERMAN, WH
KAUFMANN, RC
OGATA, ES
SEPE, SJ
机构
[1] BATTELLE MED TECHNOL ASSESSMENT & POLICY RES CTR,WASHINGTON,DC
[2] GOOD SAMARITAN HOSP,SAN JOSE,CA
[3] UNIV VERMONT,COLL MED,BURLINGTON,VT 05405
[4] WOMEN & INFANTS HOSP RHODE ISL,PROVIDENCE,RI 02908
[5] BROWN UNIV,PROGRAM MED,PROVIDENCE,RI 02912
[6] OHIO STATE UNIV,COLL MED,COLUMBUS,OH 43210
[7] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,CHICAGO,IL 60611
[8] SO ILLINOIS UNIV,SCH MED,SPRINGFIELD,IL 62708
[9] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[10] CTR DIS CONTROL,ATLANTA,GA 30333
[11] MAINE MED CTR,PORTLAND,ME 04102
[12] MERCY HOSP,PORTLAND,ME
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.16.8.1146
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To determine whether the additional costs of preconception care are balanced by the savings from averted complications. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of preconception care in reducing congenital anomalies in infants born of mothers with pre-existing diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This study used literature review, consensus development among an expert panel of physicians, and surveys of medical care personnel to obtain information about the costs and consequences of preconception plus prenatal care compared with prenatal care only for women with established diabetes. Preconception care involves close interaction between the patient and an interdisciplinary health-care team as well as intensified evaluation, follow-up, testing, and monitoring. The outcome measures assessed in this study are the medical costs of preconception care versus prenatal care only and the benefit-cost ratio. RESULTS- The costs of preconception plus prenatal care are $17,519/delivery, whereas the costs of prenatal care only are $13,843/delivery. Taking into account maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, the net savings of preconception care are $1720/enrollee over prenatal care only and the benefit-cost ratio is 1.86. The preconception care program remained cost saving across a wide range of assumptions regarding incidence of adverse outcomes and program cost components. CONCLUSIONS - Despite significantly higher per delivery costs for participants in a hypothetical preconception care program, intensive medical care before conception resulted in cost savings compared with prenatal care only. Third- party payers can expect to realize cost savings by reimbursing preconception care in this high-risk population.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1157
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Berenson RA., 1984, INTENSIVE CARE UNITS
[2]  
BRANN AW, 1987, NEONATAL PERINATAL M, P534
[3]  
CARR BR, 1987, HARRISONS PRINCIPLES, P214
[4]  
COMBS CA, 1991, BAILLIERE CLIN OB GY, V5, P315
[5]  
Cousins L, 1987, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V42, P140
[6]   SIGNIFICANT DECREASE IN CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS IN NEWBORN-INFANTS OF AN UNSELECTED POPULATION OF DIABETIC WOMEN [J].
DAMM, P ;
MOLSTEDPEDERSEN, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (05) :1163-1167
[7]  
Disbrow D D, 1988, J Pediatr Perinat Nutr, V2, P17
[8]   FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF IMPLEMENTING STANDARDS OF CARE FOR DIABETES AND PREGNANCY [J].
ELIXHAUSER, A ;
WESCHLER, JM ;
KITZMILLER, JL ;
BENNERT, HW ;
COUSTAN, DR ;
GABBE, SG ;
HERMAN, W ;
KAUFMANN, RC ;
OGATA, ES ;
MARKS, JS ;
SEPE, SJ .
DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (01) :22-28
[9]  
ELIXHAUSER A, 1993, US PHS17 AG HLTH CAR
[10]  
ELIXHAUSER A, 1990, COST BENEFIT ANAL PR