EVALUATION OF THE MPN, ANDERSON-BAIRD-PARKER, PETRIFILM ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND FLUOROCULT ECD METHOD FOR ENUMERATION OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI IN FOODS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN

被引:18
作者
BREDIE, WLP [1 ]
DEBOER, E [1 ]
机构
[1] INSPECTORATE HLTH PROTECT, POB 9012, 7200 GN ZUTPHEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
ESCHERICHIA-COLI; ENUMERATION METHOD; MEAT; POULTRY;
D O I
10.1016/0168-1605(92)90080-M
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Commercially available beta-D-glucuronidase (GUR) based methods, Petrifilm E. coli (PEC) and Fluorocult ECD (FECD), and ISO standard MPN and Anderson-Baird-Parker (ABP) procedures were evaluated for routine enumeration of E. coli in naturally contaminated foods of animal origin. The methods concerned were classifiable in a sequence of best qualities for: production, MPN > ABP = PEC = FECD; costs, FECD > ABP = PEC > MPN; time per measurement, ABP = PEC = FECD > MPN; practical use, PEC > FECD > ABP > MPN; detection at low contamination, MPN > ABP = PEC > FECD. The ABP and PEC method appeared useful for routine counting of E. coli in raw meat, poultry and meat products, whereas the MPN procedure turned out to be more sensitive, however, impractical and considerably more expensive. The FECD method was inexpensive although suitable for the enumeration of E. coli at higher contamination level (> 50 cfu/g). The indole and MUG indicators both applied to demonstrate E. coli with the ABP or FECD method proved to be equal in specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 208
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条