Effect of conidial concentration of Monilinia fructicola on brown rot development in detached cherries

被引:13
作者
Northover, J
Biggs, AR
机构
[1] Pest Management Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Vineland Station, ON, LOR 2E0
[2] West Virginia University, University Experiment Farm, Kearneysville, WV, 25430
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07060669509500682
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Mature sweet and sour (tart) cherries, free of fungicide residues, were harvested, arranged in trays and inoculated without wounding with single 33 mu L drops containing 1 x 10(3) to 1 x 10(6) conidia/mL of Monilinia fructicola. After 22 h wetting at 20 degrees C, fruits were dried (2-4 h), incubated at 20 degrees C, and evaluated daily for development of lesions and sporodochia for 8 da or 9 da post-inoculation. For sweet cherry fruits, increasing the inoculum concentration advanced initial lesion appearance from 5 da to 2 da post-inoculation, increased the incidences of fruits with lesions from 23% to 99% (9 da) and increased the proportions of fruits with sporodochia from 21% to 99% (9 da). The response pattern of ripe sour cherry fruits was very similar, with initial lesion appearance advanced from 4 da to 2 da, and the incidences of fruits with lesions and sporodochia increased from 9% to 92%, and from 9% to 91%, respectively, after 8 da postinoculation incubation. Fruits of Vista sweet cherry were five times more susceptible to infection than those of Montmorency sour cherry. Longer wetting durations of 36 h and 48 h, increased lesion and sporodochial development of Bing sweet cherry fruits, especially from low inoculum concentrations. Similar numbers of conidia applied in 3-10 mu L drops induced a slightly higher incidence of lesions than when applied in 30 mu L drops. The responses of the proportions of fruits with lesions or sporodochia to inoculum concentration and post-inoculation incubation time, or inoculation wetting duration, were described by polynomial models.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE, V2
[2]  
Biggs A. R., 1992, Phytopathology, V82, P1105
[3]  
BIGGS AR, 1989, HORTSCIENCE, V24, P126
[4]   EARLY AND LATE-SEASON SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PEACH FRUITS TO MONILINIA-FRUCTICOLA [J].
BIGGS, AR ;
NORTHOVER, J .
PLANT DISEASE, 1988, 72 (12) :1070-1074
[5]   INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE AND WETNESS DURATION ON INFECTION OF PEACH AND SWEET CHERRY FRUITS BY MONILINIA-FRUCTICOLA [J].
BIGGS, AR ;
NORTHOVER, J .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1988, 78 (10) :1352-1356
[6]  
BROWN SK, 1989, HORTSCIENCE, V24, P1013
[7]   FACTORS DETERMINING LENGTH OF INCUBATION PERIOD OF MONILINIA FRUCTICOLA (WINT) HONEY IN FRUITS OF PRUNUS SPP [J].
CORBIN, JB .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1963, 14 (01) :51-&
[8]  
FOURIE J F, 1985, Phytophylactica, V17, P179
[9]  
HALL R, 1971, Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, V72, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1971.tb03200.x
[10]   A TABLE OF ABBOTT CORRECTION FOR NATURAL MORTALITY [J].
HEALY, MJR .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1952, 39 (02) :211-212