Suppression of bitterness by sodium: Variation among bitter taste stimuli

被引:165
作者
Breslin, PAS
Beauchamp, GK
机构
[1] Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308
关键词
D O I
10.1093/chemse/20.6.609
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Taste interactions between salts (NaCl, LiCl, KCI, L-arginine:L-aspartic acid, Na-acetate and Na-gluconate) and bitter-tasting compounds (urea, quinine HCl, magnesium sulphate, KCI, amiloride HCl and caffeine) were investigated. In each study binary combinations of three or four concentrations of one bitter compound with four concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 M) of one salt were rated for bitterness and saltiness using the method of magnitude estimation. In most cases, perceived bitterness was suppressed by salts, although the degree of suppression varied. In general, bitterness suppression was not accompanied by an equivalent reciprocal suppression of saltiness. Only MgSO4 and amiloride had suppressing effects on the saltiness of NaCl at the intermediate concentrations and no bitter compound affected the saltiness at the high concentrations of NaCl. Since salt suppressed the bitterness of urea effectively, a detailed analysis of suppression of the bitterness of urea by different salts was conducted. Those studies indicated that the key component in this effect was the sodium or lithium ion for two reasons: first, all three sodium salts and the lithium salt had a suppressive effect on bitterness, whereas KCI did not; secondly, the effect of a salt on suppression of the bitterness of urea was independent of its perceived saltiness; that is, NaCl, Na-acetate (which is perceived as less salty than NaCl), and Na-gluconate (which is perceived as less salty than Na-acetate) reduced bitterness comparably. These results suggest that there is a major peripheral component to the suppression of the bitterness of urea, and perhaps other bitter tasting compounds, by sodium.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 623
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Bartoshuk L.M., 1980, BIOLOGICAL BEHAV ASP, P83, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-397750-2.50014-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-397750-2.50014-8]
[2]   TASTE MIXTURES - IS MIXTURE SUPPRESSION RELATED TO COMPRESSION [J].
BARTOSHUK, LM .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (05) :643-649
[3]  
BARTOSHUK LM, 1982, SUPPRESSION QHCI MIX
[4]  
BARTOSHUK LM, 1979, TASTE INTERACTIONS M
[5]  
BARTOSHUK LM, 1977, OLFACTION TASTE, V6, P377
[6]  
BRAND JG, 1992, IFT BAS SYM, V7, P517
[7]   BITTER TASTE IN AGING - COMPOUND-SPECIFIC DECLINE IN SENSITIVITY [J].
COWART, BJ ;
YOKOMUKAI, Y ;
BEAUCHAMP, GK .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 56 (06) :1237-1241
[8]   MODEL FOR STIMULATION OF TASTE RECEPTOR CELLS BY SALT [J].
DESIMONE, JA ;
PRICE, S .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 16 (08) :869-881
[9]   EFFECTS OF AMILORIDE ON SALT TASTE IN HUMANS [J].
DESOR, JA ;
FINN, J .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 1989, 14 (06) :793-803
[10]   QUININE DIMORPHISM - A CARDINAL DETERMINANT OF TASTE SENSITIVITY [J].
FISCHER, R ;
GRIFFIN, F .
NATURE, 1963, 200 (490) :343-&