OPTIC-NERVE HEAD ANALYZER AND HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH - RELATIVE ERROR AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF TOPOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS IN A MODEL EYE WITH SIMULATED

被引：20

作者：

JANKNECHT, P

FUNK, J

机构：

[1] Universitäts-Augenklinik, Freiburg, D-79106

来源：

GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 1995年 / 233卷 / 08期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/BF00183434

中图分类号：

R77 [眼科学];

学科分类号：

100212 ;

摘要：

Background: We measured the relative error and reproducibility of the optic nerve head analyzer (ONHA) and the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) in a model eye with a cataract that was simulated by Bangerter foils. Methods: There were two artificial discs and one retinal elevation (the latter could not be analyzed by the ONHA) that could be inserted into the model eye. The relative error of the parameter 'cup area' ('cup volume') of the ONHA for the measurement of artificial disc no. 1 changed from 1.1% (5.4%) without Bangerter foil to 7.9% (7.6%) with Bangerter foil 0.6. The standard deviation of the ONHA increased from 0.059 mm(2) (0.1 mm(3)) without Bangerter foil to 0.142 mm(2) (0.121 mm(3)) with Bangerter foil 0.6. With the smaller artificial disc no. 2, no measurements with Bangerter foils were obtained. Results: Relative error and reproducibility of the parameter 'volume below (above) surface' of the HRT did not show any consistent change with increasing intensity of the simulated cataract. With artificial disc no. 1, the relative error without Bangerter foil was 14.6%, while the worst relative error with one of the Bangerter foils 0.8 to 0.4 was 16.4%. The corresponding values for the standard deviation were 0.019 mm(3) and 0.033 mm(3). With the smaller artificial disc no. 2, the relative error without Bangerter foil was 6.3%, while the worst relative error with one of the Bangerter foils 0.8 to 0.2 was 18.3%. The corresponding values for the standard deviation were 0.016 mm(3) and 0.017 mm(3). The relative error in measuring a retinal elevation without a Bangerter foil was 6.3%, with a Bangerter foil 11.2-18.0%. The standard deviation was 0.068 mm(3) without Bangerter foil and 0.013-0.023 mm(3) with Bangerter foils. Conclusion: Our data support the assumption that the HRT is able to measure fundus structures even in the case of opaque optical media. The HRT is superior to the ONHA in this regard.

引用

页码：523 / 529

页数：7

共 16 条

[1]

Bishop K.I., Werner E.B., Krupin T., Kozart D.M., Beck S.R., Nunan F.A., Wax M.B., Variability and reproducibility on optic disk topographic measurements with the Rodenstock optic nerve head analyzer, Am J Ophthalmol, 106, pp. 696-702, (1988)

[2]

Caprioli J., Klingbeil U., Sears M., Pope, Reproducibility of optic disk measurements with computerized analysis of stereoscopic video images, Arch Ophthamol, 104, pp. 1035-1039, (1986)

[3]

Dannheim F., Klingbeil U., Die Bestimmung räumlicher Papillendaten mit dem “Fundusanalysator”, Fortschr Ophthalmol, 83, pp. 527-529, (1986)

[4]

Dreher A.W., Weinreb R.N., Accuracy of topographic measurements in a model eye with the laser tomographic scanner, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 32, pp. 2992-2996, (1991)

[5]

Dreher A.W., Tso P.C., Weinreb R.N., Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner, Am J Ophthalmol, 111, pp. 221-229, (1991)

[6]

Funk J., Steeb R., Verbesserte Reproduzierbarkeit der computergesteuerten Papillenanalyse, Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd, 199, pp. 25-29, (1991)

[7]

Gramer E., Klingbeil U., Quantitative disc analysis with the optic nerve head analyzer, Z Prakt Augenheilkd, 7, (1986)

[8]

Klingbeil U., Fundus geometry measured with the analyzing stereo video ophthalmoscope, Noninvasive diagnostic techniques in ophthalmology, (1990)

[9]

Kruse F.E., Burk R.O.W., Volcker H-E, Zinser G., Harbarth U., Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning, Ophthalmology, 96, pp. 1320-1324, (1989)

[10]

Mikelberg F.S., Douglas G.R., Schulzer M., Cornsweet T.N., Wijsman K., Reliability of optic disk topographic measurements recorded with a video-ophthalmometer, Am J Ophthalmol, 98, pp. 98-102, (1984)

← 1 2 →