Framing yourself into a corner: Russia, Crimea, and the minimal action space

被引:14
作者
Hansen, Flemming Splidsboel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Cross Cultural & Reg Studies, Karen Blixens Vej, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Russia; Ukraine; Crimea; action space; framing; neoclassical realism;
D O I
10.1080/09662839.2014.993974
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
A long-held axiom, political leaders are said to favour an action space sufficiently wide to allow them, as a minimum, a face-saving exit. This makes it particularly interesting for us to study those rare cases where political leaders seem to be deliberately reducing their policy options to the point of having merely one line to pursue. The handling by Russian President Vladimir Putin of the early 2014 crisis over Crimea, eventually leading to the annexation by Russia of the Ukrainian Peninsula on 21 March 2014, seems to represent such a rare case. Through the use of state-controlled media, a highly dichotomized framing of the crisis was presented to the Russian audience, essentially leaving Putin with just the one option of acting to "save" the Crimeans from the Ukrainian Government by bringing them into Russia.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 158
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Lessons from Russia - A neo-authoritarian media system [J].
Becker, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2004, 19 (02) :139-163
[2]  
Brown J., 2010, POLITICS, V30, P156
[3]  
Buzan Barry, 1998, SECURITY NEW FRAMEWO, P23
[4]  
Danilov A. A., 2009, ISTORIYA ROSSII 1945
[5]  
Entman R., 2004, PROJECTIONS POWER FR
[7]  
Flood C., 2002, POLITICAL MYTH, P46
[8]  
Hansen F. S., 2014, INT POLITICS REV, V2, P31
[9]  
Hansen F. S., 2010, POLITIK, V2, P6
[10]  
Hill F., 2012, NATL INTEREST