ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS

被引:819
作者
ARMSTRONG, JS [1 ]
COLLOPY, F [1 ]
机构
[1] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,WEATHERHEAD SCH,CLEVELAND,OH 44106
关键词
FORECAST ACCURACY; M-COMPETITION; RELATIVE ABSOLUTE ERROR; THEILS-U;
D O I
10.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-W
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study evaluated measures for making comparisons of errors across time series. We analyzed 90 annual and 101 quarterly economic time series. We judged error measures on reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to small changes, protection against outliers, and their relationship to decision making. The results lead us to recommend the Geometric Mean of the Relative Absolute Error (GMRAE) when the task involves calibrating a model for a set of time series. The GMRAE compares the absolute error of a given method to that from the random walk forecast. For selecting the most accurate methods, we recommend the Median RAE (MdRAE) when few series are available and the Median Absolute Percentage Error (MdAPE) otherwise. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is not reliable, and is therefore inappropriate for comparing accuracy across series.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 80
页数:12
相关论文
共 8 条