Interpersonal trust and inter-firm trust in construction projects

被引:99
作者
Lau, Ellen [1 ]
Rowlinson, Steve [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Div Bldg Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Interpersonal trust; inter-firm trust; relationship; partnering; project;
D O I
10.1080/01446190903003886
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Working relationships are important in effecting project performance and cooperation is believed to be a behavioural consequence of trust. Trust, being a quality of relationships, involves people interacting at interpersonal and inter-firm levels. This is investigated through 10 partnering and non-partnering projects, using a validated trust scale. A case study approach is used to collect qualitative data through a quantitative approach to help understand the concept of trust. Data were collected from clients, contractors, consultants and subcontractors. Clients and contractors have a tendency to trust individuals whereas contractors and subcontractors have a tendency to trust firms. Inter-firm trust is better understood than interpersonal trust; but both are associated with keeping commitments and demonstrating cooperation, even though interpersonal trust is considered more important. Partnering does not necessarily exhibit more trust than non-partnering projects whereas clients and contractors have different emphasis on interpersonal and inter-firm trust. Therefore, to promote trusting relationships in multi-parties is to fulfil not only the technological and economical goals, but also the moral and social goals as expressed in people relationships such that a socially safe working place can be created. For this reason, middle managers need to know about trust because they face more relationship problems than others.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 554
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[2]  
Argyle M., 1985, ANATOMY RELATIONSHIP
[3]  
Argyle M., 1991, COOPERATION BASIS SO
[4]  
Axelrod R., 1997, COMPLEXITY COOPERATI
[5]   TRUSTWORTHINESS AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, JB ;
HANSEN, MH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 :175-190
[6]  
Bennett J., 1996, TRUST TEAM BEST PRAC
[7]  
Bennett J., 1998, 7 PILLARS PARTNERING
[8]  
Block P, 1987, EMPOWERED MANAGER PO
[9]  
Blois K., 1998, J BUSINESS IND MARKE, V13, P256, DOI DOI 10.1108/08858629810222289
[10]  
Bolton R., 1996, PEOPLE STYLES WORK M