A Micro-econometric Analysis of Public Support to Private R&D in Argentina

被引:34
作者
Binelli, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Maffioli, Alessandro [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, 7 Ridgmount St, London WC1E 7AE, England
[2] Inst Fiscal Studies, London, England
[3] Interamer Dev Bank, Off Evaluat & Oversight, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Insubria, Varese, Italy
关键词
Innovation and R&D; policy evaluation; panel data;
D O I
10.1080/02692170701390320
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relationship between government interventions to promote investments in innovation and firm-financed R&D. Merging a unique panel data set on Argentinean firms in the 1990s with a data base on different types of public support received through the FONTAR (Fondo Tecnologico Argentino) program, we estimate a fixed effects model and find evidence of a significant positive impact of FONTAR on private R&D. A 1 per cent increase in the amount received through FONTAR induces an average increase of 547.6 real pesos in annual R&D expenditures. The result is robust to the use of an instrumental variable estimator that controls for the potential bias induced by changes in the structure of the program. An analysis by type of financial support reveals that the impact is mainly due to targeted and fiscal credit with no evidence that funding received through matching grants has an additionality effect on private investments. This result is in line with the predictions of a simple theoretical model that investigates the impact of different policy interventions to promote investments in R&D. When firms' preferences are not directly observable, the provision of direct subsidies is more likely to incur the risk of adverse selection attracting firms that would have invested in innovation even in the absence of public support or dismiss some of the non-financed projects, thus leaving unchanged or decreasing the overall level of expenditures in R&D.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 359
页数:21
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[2]  
Benavente J. M., 2004, IMPACT PUBLIC FINANC
[3]  
Blundell R., 2002, CEMMAP WORKING PAPER
[4]  
Chudnovsky D., 2006, OVE WORKING PAPERS, V1606
[5]  
Czarnitzki D., 2007, J APPL EC IN PRESS
[6]   Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence [J].
David, PA ;
Hall, BH ;
Toole, AA .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (4-5) :497-529
[7]   IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF LOCAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECTS [J].
IMBENS, GW ;
ANGRIST, JD .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (02) :467-475
[8]   Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies [J].
Klette, TJ ;
Moen, J ;
Griliches, Z .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (4-5) :471-495
[9]   Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel [J].
Lach, S .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 50 (04) :369-390
[10]  
Sanguinetti P., 2005, INNOVATIONS R D EXPE