APPROACH TO STUDY OF BUREAUCRACY

[1] [Anonymous], PATTERNS IND BUREAUC

[2] BAKKE E, 1959, MODERN ORG THEORY

[3] Brogden HE., 1949, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V14, P169, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02289151

[4] Burns T., 1961, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO

[5] THE USSR - FROM CHARISMATIC SECT TO BUREAUCRATIC SOCIETY [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1961, 6 (03) : 282 - 298

[6] Crozier M., 1964, BUREAUCRAT PHENOMEN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315131092

[7] Dahrendorf R., 1959, CLASS CONFLICT IND S

[8] ALIENATION - ITS MEANING AND MEASUREMENT [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1961, 26 (05) : 753 - 758

[9] Demerath NicolasJay., 1965, SOCIAL CLASS AM PROT

[10] FEUER L, 1962, NEW POLIT, V1, P116

[1] [Anonymous], PATTERNS IND BUREAUC

[2] BAKKE E, 1959, MODERN ORG THEORY

[3] Brogden HE., 1949, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V14, P169, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02289151

[4] Burns T., 1961, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO

[5] THE USSR - FROM CHARISMATIC SECT TO BUREAUCRATIC SOCIETY [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1961, 6 (03) : 282 - 298

[6] Crozier M., 1964, BUREAUCRAT PHENOMEN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315131092

[7] Dahrendorf R., 1959, CLASS CONFLICT IND S

[8] ALIENATION - ITS MEANING AND MEASUREMENT [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1961, 26 (05) : 753 - 758

[9] Demerath NicolasJay., 1965, SOCIAL CLASS AM PROT

[10] FEUER L, 1962, NEW POLIT, V1, P116