POTENTIAL OF CERVICAL ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA

被引:33
作者
HERZOG, TJ
WILLIAMS, S
ADLER, LM
RADER, JS
KUBINEC, R
CAMEL, HM
MUTCH, DG
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1995.1144
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential, treatment efficacy, specimen adequacy, and acute complication rate associated with electrosurgical excision procedure (EEP) of the cervix for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN). Analysis was performed retrospectively on 153 consecutive patients who underwent EEP under colposcopic guidance. Patients with negative endocervical curettage (ECC), adequate colposcopy, and biopsy-proven CIN were considered candidates for therapeutic EEP, whereas patients with a positive ECC, inadequate colposcopy, or cytology two or more grades discordant from the biopsy results underwent diagnostic EEP. Histopathologic specimens were graded as adequate, suboptimal, or inadequate. Diagnostic EEP was performed in 85 cases, and the remaining 68 procedures were performed primarily for treatment. Specimens were graded as adequate in 83%, suboptimal in 13%, and inadequate in 4% of the diagnostic EEP's. Specimen adequacy correlated most strongly with operator experience (P < 0.05). Four patients were found to have microinvasive or invasive cervical carcinoma. Complications occurred in 7% of the EEPs performed. Most consisted of immediate or delayed hemorrhage. In conclusion, EEP is a safe, well-tolerated procedure which is acceptable as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in the management of CIN when performed by an experienced operator. We recommend that initial EEP procedures should be performed for therapeutic indications, since adequacy of EEP specimens correlated with the level of operator experience. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 293
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Prendiville W., Davies R., Berry P.J., A low voltage diathermy loop for taking cervical biopsies: A qualitative comparison with punch biopsy forceps, Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 93, pp. 773-776, (1986)
  • [2] Prendiville W., Cullimore J., Norman S., Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepi the I i al neoplasia, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 96, pp. 1054-1060, (1989)
  • [3] Cartier Sopena R.B., Cartier I., Use of the diathermy loop in the diagnosis and treatment of lesions of the uterine cervix: 4th World Congress, Int. Fed. Cervical Pathol. Colpose, (1981)
  • [4] Luesley D.M., Cullimore J., Redman C.W.E., Lawton F.G., Emens J.M., Rollason T.P., Williams D.R., Buxton E.J., Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal cervical smears, Br. Med. J, 300, pp. 1690-1693, (1990)
  • [5] Whiteley P.F., Olah K.S., Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Experience with the low-voltage diathermy loop, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 162, pp. 1272-1277, (1990)
  • [6] Gunasekera P.C., Phipps J.H., Lewis B.V., Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: A superior mode of treatment, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 97, pp. 995-998, (1990)
  • [7] Bigrigg M.A., Codling B.W., Pearson P., Read M.D., Swingler G.R., Colposcopie diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit, Lancet, 336, pp. 229-231, (1990)
  • [8] Wright T.C., Richart R.M., Ferenczy A., Koulos J., Comparison of specimens removed by C02 laser conization and the loop electrosur-gical excision procedure, Obstet. Gynecol, 79, 1, pp. 147-153, (1992)
  • [9] Baggish M.S., Barash F., Noel Y., Brooks M., Comparison of thermal injury zones in loop electrical and laser cervical excisional conization, Am. J. Ostet. Gynecol, 166, pp. 645-648, (1992)
  • [10] Mor-Yosef S., Lopes A., Pearson S., Monaghan J.M., Instruments and methods: Loop diathermy cone biopsy, Obstet. Gynecol, 75, pp. 884-886, (1990)