IDENTIFYING ADULTS AT INCREASED RISK OF CORONARY-DISEASE - HOW WELL DO THE CURRENT CHOLESTEROL GUIDELINES WORK

被引:182
作者
GROVER, SA
COUPAL, L
HU, XF
机构
[1] MONTREAL GEN HOSP,DIV CLIN EPIDEMIOL,MONTREAL,PQ H3G 1A4,CANADA
[2] MONTREAL GEN HOSP,DIV GEN INTERNAL MED,MONTREAL,PQ H3G 1A4,CANADA
[3] MCGILL UNIV,DEPT MED,MONTREAL,PQ,CANADA
[4] MCGILL UNIV,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,MONTREAL,PQ,CANADA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1995年 / 274卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.274.10.801
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To assess the accuracy of lipid screening strategies to identify individuals at increased risk of coronary heart disease mortality. Patients.-The 15% random sample of adults recruited into the Lipid Research Clinic Prevalence and Follow-up Studies, which included 3678 men and women aged 35 to 74 years. Total plasma cholesterol levels, lipoprotein fractions, and other coronary risk factors at study entry were compared with subsequent coronary heart disease mortality (mean follow-up, 12.2 years). Outcome Measures.-The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for blood lipids, lipid ratios, the screening guidelines proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program, those of the Canadian Consensus Conference on Cholesterol, and a coronary risk model that used Framingham data. Main Results.-The current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines (area under the curve, 0.74) were significantly (P=.03) more accurate than the old National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines (area, 0.72). The ratio of total plasma cholesterol level to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (area, 0.72) was as accurate as current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The coronary risk model (area, 0.85) was superior (P<.003) to all other screening maneuvers, Compared with the current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, the risk model demonstrated superior test sensitivity (70% vs 45%) with only slightly reduced specificity (82% vs 86%). Conclusion.-The ratio of total plasma cholesterol level to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level is as accurate as current American screening guidelines, Future guidelines should better incorporate high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and nonlipid risk factors to target high-risk individuals accurately.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 806
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] CORONARY HEART-DISEASE RISK - THE IMPORTANCE OF JOINT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CHOLESTEROL LEVELS IN INDIVIDUAL LIPOPROTEIN CLASSES
    ABBOTT, RD
    GARRISON, RJ
    WILSON, PW
    CASTELLI, WP
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1982, 11 (02) : 131 - 141
  • [2] ABBOTT RD, 1987, US DHEW NIH872284 PU
  • [3] AN UPDATED CORONARY RISK PROFILE - A STATEMENT FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS
    ANDERSON, KM
    WILSON, PWF
    ODELL, PM
    KANNEL, WB
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) : 356 - 362
  • [4] SCREENING FOR TOTAL CHOLESTEROL - DO THE NATIONAL CHOLESTEROL EDUCATION-PROGRAMS RECOMMENDATIONS DETECT INDIVIDUALS AT HIGH-RISK OF CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    BUSH, TL
    RIEDEL, D
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (04) : 1287 - 1293
  • [5] HDL CHOLESTEROL AND OTHER LIPIDS IN CORONARY HEART-DISEASE - COOPERATIVE LIPOPROTEIN PHENOTYPING STUDY
    CASTELLI, WP
    DOYLE, JT
    GORDON, T
    HAMES, CG
    HJORTLAND, MC
    HULLEY, SB
    KAGAN, A
    ZUKEL, WJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1977, 55 (05) : 767 - 772
  • [6] INCIDENCE OF CORONARY HEART-DISEASE AND LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL LEVELS - THE FRAMINGHAM-STUDY
    CASTELLI, WP
    GARRISON, RJ
    WILSON, PWF
    ABBOTT, RD
    KALOUSDIAN, S
    KANNEL, WB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 256 (20): : 2835 - 2838
  • [7] BLOOD LIPID MEASUREMENTS - VARIATIONS AND PRACTICAL UTILITY
    COOPER, GR
    MYERS, GL
    SMITH, SJ
    SCHLANT, RC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (12): : 1652 - 1660
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF HMG-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITION FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    GOLDMAN, L
    WEINSTEIN, MC
    GOLDMAN, PA
    WILLIAMS, LW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (09): : 1145 - 1151
  • [9] GROVER SA, 1992, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V267, P816
  • [10] GROVER SA, 1991, CAN MED ASSOC J, V144, P161