PREOPERATIVE LOCAL INFILTRATION WITH ROPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY

被引:83
作者
JOHANSSON, B
GLISE, H
HALLERBACK, B
DALMAN, P
KRISTOFFERSSON, A
机构
[1] BORAS HOSP,DEPT SURG,SODERTALJE,SWEDEN
[2] ASTRA RES CTR AB,CLIN RES & DEV,SODERTALJE,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.1213/00000539-199402000-00003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the use of preoperative local anesthesia with regard to postoperative pain. Before surgery in 66 patients scheduled for cholecystectomy, the abdominal wall along the proposed line of incision was infiltrated with 70 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine, 70 mt of 0.125% ropivacaine, or 70 mt of saline. Wound pain at rest, wound pain during mobilization, and pressure exerted to reach maximum pain tolerance were assessed after 6, 26, 50, and 74 h and after 7 days. Consumption of analgesics was recorded. At the 6-h assessment, there was a statistically significant dose-related decrease in wound pain during mobilization (P = 0.001) and an increase of pressure exerted to reach maximum pain tolerance (P < 0.001). The tests were two-tailed and performed at a significance level of P < 0.05. There were no significant differences between the groups at later pain control assessments. The median time to first request for postoperative analgesics was significantly shorter (P = 0.014) in the saline group than in the ropivacaine 0.25% group. These effects are suggested to be a residual anesthetic effect of ropivacaine. The study gives no support to the hypothesis that preoperative local anesthetics dampen the inflammatory response and ensuing hyperalgesia.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] WOUND INFILTRATION WITH 0.25-PERCENT-BUPIVACAINE NOT EFFECTIVE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    ADAMS, WJ
    AVRAMOVIC, J
    BARRACLOUGH, BH
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 61 (08): : 626 - 630
  • [2] PAIN AND MOBILITY AFTER INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY - INEFFECTIVENESS OF SUBCUTANEOUS BUPIVACAINE
    CAMERON, AEP
    CROSS, FW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [3] CONTINUOUS WOUND PERFUSION WITH BUPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE WOUND PAIN
    GIBBS, P
    PURUSHOTHAM, A
    AULD, C
    CUSCHIERI, RJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (09) : 923 - 924
  • [4] HASHEMI K, 1983, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V65, P38
  • [5] THE EFFECT OF PRE-INCISIONAL INFILTRATION OF TONSILS WITH BUPIVACAINE ON THE PAIN FOLLOWING TONSILLECTOMY UNDER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA
    JEBELES, JA
    REILLY, JS
    GUTIERREZ, JF
    BRADLEY, EL
    KISSIN, I
    [J]. PAIN, 1991, 47 (03) : 305 - 308
  • [6] Kehlet H., 1988, ACTA CHIR SCAND S, V550, P22
  • [7] A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF MANTEL-HAENSZEL METHODS - APPLICATIONS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
    KURITZ, SJ
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1988, 9 : 123 - 160
  • [8] OWEN H, 1985, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V67, P114
  • [9] PATEL JM, 1983, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V157, P338
  • [10] ACUTE TOXICITY OF ROPIVACAINE COMPARED WITH THAT OF BUPIVACAINE
    SCOTT, DB
    LEE, A
    FAGAN, D
    BOWLER, GMR
    BLOOMFIELD, P
    LUNDH, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1989, 69 (05) : 563 - 569