A CONSUMERS GUIDE TO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE URODYNAMIC EQUIPMENT

被引：6

作者：

BARNES, DG ^{[1
]}

RALPH, D ^{[1
]}

LEWIS, CA ^{[1
]}

SHAW, PJR ^{[1
]}

WORTH, PHL ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ST PAULS HOSP,DEPT MED PHYS,LONDON,ENGLAND

来源：

BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1991年 / 68卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1464-410X.1991.tb15281.x

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病）];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Eight commercially available urodynamic machines from 6 major manufacturers (Aspen Medical, Dantec, Electro-Medical Supplies (EMS), Uro-gyn, Ormed and Wiest) were assessed for accuracy, construction and user-friendliness. There was < 10% inaccuracy with regard to fill volume, void rate and pressure measurements. The Wiest 6000 plus system was between 11 and 14% inaccurate during voided volume measurement and other systems were < 10% inaccurate. User-friendliness was assessed during routine cystometry and is mainly dependent on the software supplied with the equipment. The merits and faults of each urodynamic system with regard to performing a urodynamic investigation, running a urodynamic service and data management are compared with an "ideal" urodynamic system.

引用

页码：138 / 143

页数：6