ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF YEASTS - A BRIEF OVERVIEW

被引:32
作者
SHEEHAN, DJ
ESPINELINGROFF, A
MOORE, LS
WEBB, CD
机构
[1] Roerig Division, U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY
[2] Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA
[3] Medical Center of Delaware, Wilmington, DE
关键词
D O I
10.1093/clinids/17.Supplement_2.S494
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts has lacked reproducibility because of the absence of universally accepted guidelines. The major sources of variation in susceptibility testing have been attributed to the choice of medium and pH, inoculum preparation and size, incubation temperature and time, and end-point criteria. These parameters have been addressed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing, and proposed guidelines have recently been published. Although major advances in antifungal susceptibility testing have been achieved, particularly through the efforts of the NCCLS subcommittee, the results of studies to date do not support a correlation between the results of in vitro susceptibility testing and in vivo response. Routine antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts should therefore be discouraged until the methodology is standardized such that it predicts clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:S494 / S500
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
BOYLE FT, 1987, RECENT TRENDS DISCOV, P31
[2]   ANALYSIS OF PH AND BUFFER EFFECTS ON FLUCYTOSINE ACTIVITY IN BROTH DILUTION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CANDIDA-ALBICANS IN 2 SYNTHETIC MEDIA [J].
CALHOUN, DL ;
GALGIANI, JN .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1984, 26 (03) :364-367
[3]   RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS IN THE UNITED-STATES AND INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON OF BROTH DILUTION TESTING OF FLUCYTOSINE AND AMPHOTERICIN-B [J].
CALHOUN, DL ;
ROBERTS, GD ;
GALGIANI, JN ;
BENNETT, JE ;
FEINGOLD, DS ;
JORGENSEN, J ;
KOBAYASHI, GS ;
SHADOMY, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (02) :298-301
[4]   EFFECT OF MEDIUM COMPOSITION ON RESULTS OF MACROBROTH DILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF YEASTS [J].
DOERN, GV ;
TUBERT, TA ;
CHAPIN, K ;
RINALDI, MG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 24 (04) :507-511
[5]  
DRUTZ DJ, 1987, REV INFECT DIS, V9, P392
[6]   COLLABORATIVE COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS [J].
ESPINELINGROFF, A ;
KISH, CW ;
KERKERING, TM ;
FROMTLING, RA ;
BARTIZAL, K ;
GALGIANI, JN ;
VILLAREAL, K ;
PFALLER, MA ;
GERARDEN, T ;
RINALDI, MG ;
FOTHERGILL, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (12) :3138-3145
[7]   COMPARISON STUDY OF BROTH MACRODILUTION AND MICRODILUTION ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS [J].
ESPINELINGROFF, A ;
KERKERING, TM ;
GOLDSON, PR ;
SHADOMY, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (06) :1089-1094
[8]  
ESPINELINGROFF A, 1989, EUR J MICROBIL INFEC, V8, P532
[9]  
FROMTILING R A, 1988, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, V1, P187
[10]  
GALGIANI JN, 1990, REV INFECT DIS, V12, pS272