SUPERFICIAL BLADDER-CANCER - THE RESPONSE OF A MARKER TUMOR TO A SINGLE INTRAVESICAL INSTILLATION OF EPIRUBICIN

被引:35
作者
POPERT, RJM
GOODALL, J
COPTCOAT, MJ
THOMPSON, PM
PARMAR, MKB
MASTERS, JRW
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL HOSP,DEPT UROL,LONDON,ENGLAND
[2] JOYCE GREEN HOSP,DEPT UROL,DARTFORD,KENT,ENGLAND
[3] MRC,CANC TRIALS OFF,CAMBRIDGE,CAMBS,ENGLAND
[4] INST UROL & NEPHROL,LONDON,ENGLAND
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1994年 / 74卷 / 02期
关键词
EPIRUBICIN; SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CANCER; CHEMO-RESECTION; RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb16585.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the response of a marker tumour to a single instillation of intravesical epirubicin. Patients and methods Eighty-one patients (54 men, 27 women) with a mean age of 69.3 years (range 36-92) with superficial bladder cancer were randomized to receive a single instillation of intravesical epirubicin. At the initial cystoscopy all but one papillary marker tumour was resected. Subsequently the patients were randomized to receive either intravesical epirubicin at a concentration of 1 mg/ml (n = 40) or 2 mg/ml (n = 41) in 50 ml of saline for 1 h. The response of the marker tumour was determined at 3 months (first check cystoscopy). The toxicity associated with both treatments was also recorded. Results A complete response (no visible or microscopic bladder carcinoma) was observed in 46% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35-57%) of patients. No patient experienced systemic side-effects. Chemical cystitis and bladder irritability were the most frequent local side-effects, occurring in 15% (95% CI 8-24%) of the patients. Conclusions A single instillation of intravesical epirubicin has a demonstrable effect in superficial bladder cancer. The results compare favourably with more onerous regimes. Side-effects were minimal at 1 mg/ml and acceptable at 2 mg/ml.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 199
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   EPIRUBICIN - A REVIEW OF THE PHARMACOLOGY, CLINICAL ACTIVITY, AND ADVERSE-EFFECTS OF AN ADRIAMYCIN ANALOG [J].
CERSOSIMO, RJ ;
HONG, WK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :425-439
[2]  
CUMMING JA, 1990, EUR UROL, V17, P20
[3]  
DASILVA FC, 1988, EUR UROL, V4, P207
[4]   CURRENT STATUS OF INTRAVESICAL CHEMOTHERAPY TRIALS IN THE EORTC-UROLOGICAL-GROUP - AN OVERVIEW [J].
DENIS, L ;
BOUFFIOUX, C ;
KURTH, KH ;
DEBRUYNE, F ;
SYLVESTER, R ;
DEPAUW, M .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 20 :S67-S71
[5]   SUPERFICIAL BLADDER-TUMORS (STAGE-PTA, GRADE-1 AND GRADE-2) - THE IMPORTANCE OF RECURRENCE PATTERN FOLLOWING INITIAL RESECTION [J].
FITZPATRICK, JM ;
WEST, AB ;
BUTLER, MR ;
LANE, V ;
OFLYNN, JD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (05) :920-922
[6]   SUPERFICIAL BLADDER-CANCER - PROGRESSION AND RECURRENCE [J].
HENEY, NM ;
AHMED, S ;
FLANAGAN, MJ ;
FRABLE, W ;
CORDER, MP ;
HAFERMANN, MD ;
HAWKINS, IR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (06) :1083-1086
[7]  
JONES HC, 1961, LANCET, V2, P615
[8]  
LAMM DL, 1992, UROL CLIN N AM, V19, P573
[9]   INTRAVESICAL EPIRUBICIN WITH AND WITHOUT VERAPAMIL FOR THE PROPHYLAXIS OF SUPERFICIAL BLADDER-TUMORS [J].
LUKKARINEN, O ;
PAUL, C ;
HELLSTROM, P ;
KONTTURI, M ;
NURMI, M ;
PUNTALA, P ;
OTTELIN, J ;
TAMMELA, T ;
TIDEFELDT, U .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1991, 25 (01) :25-28
[10]  
MATSUMURA Y, 1986, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V16, P176