1-ALPHA-HYDROXYVITAMIN-D-3 DERIVATIVES IN THE TREATMENT OF RENAL BONE-DISEASES - JUSTIFICATION AND OPTIMAL MODALITIES OF ADMINISTRATION

The use of 1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D-3 [1 alpha(OH)D-3] derivatives in a uremic patient is justified only in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism (i.e. when plasma intact parathyroid hormone PTH - levels are above five or three times the upper limit of normal according to whether the patient is on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis or on hemodialysis and between 0.5-1.5, 1-2 and 2-3 times the upper limit of normal for a creatinine clearance of, respectively, 30, between 30 and 10, or below 10 ml/min/1.73m(2)). The following prerequisites have however to be satisfied: (1) a good vitamin D-3 repletion should be secured by plasma 25(OH)D levels of 20-30 ng/ml (if necessary by administration of native vitamin D of 25(OH)D-3), and (2) phosphate retention (which is aggravated by the increased phosphate intestinal absorption induced by the 1 alpha(OH)D derivatives) and the consequent possible hyperphosphatemia should be prevented or corrected by the oral administration of alkaline salts of calcium given before the meals as phosphate binders without inducing hypercalcemia. These prerequisites explain the narrow therapeutical margin of 1 alpha(OH)D-3 derivatives in uremic patients before dialysis (more so in the adult than in the child) and the possible broadening of this margin in the patients on dialysis by the use of low dialysate calcium concentrations (1.25-1.00 mmol/l) in order to prevent hypercalcemia by inducing a negative perdialytic calcium balance. Once hyperphosphatemia is prevented by oral calcium, 1 alpha(OH)D-3 derivatives have the advantage to suppress the transcription of the prepro PTH gene by a mechanism independent of an increase in plasma calcium. Controlled randomized trials have not confirmed the claimed advantage in efficacy and safety of the parenteral versus the oral route nor of the intermittent versus the daily mode of their administration. The advantages of using the so called 'nonhypercalcemic hyperphosphatemic' vitamin D-3 derivatives in combination with oral calcium over 1 alpha(OH)D-3 derivatives in the treatment of uremic hyperparathyroidism are still waiting for clinical demonstration. Vitamin D derivatives have no place in the treatment of aluminic bone diseases which necessitate long term deferoxamine treatment and prevention of aluminum exposure by the dialysate and the phosphate binders. They are not indicated in the treatment of 'idiopathic' adynamic bone disease which is due to uremia per se combined with an excessive PTH suppression for the degree of renal failure. This low bone turnover pattern is associated with an increased risk of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia and necessitates only a stimulation of PTH secretion by inducing a negative calcium balance with a lower dialysate calcium concentration or simply by discontinuing the oral calcium supplement in the uremic patient not yet dialyzed. In rare cases this pattern is due to a granulomatosis and is corrected by prednisone.