U.S.-Japan and U.S.-China trade conflict: Export growth, reciprocity, and the international trading system

被引:12
作者
Bown, Chad P. [1 ,2 ]
McCulloch, Rachel [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Dev Econ Res Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Brandeis Univ, Dept Econ, MS021, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
[4] Brandeis Univ, Int Business Sch, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
关键词
GATT; WTO; Reciprocity;
D O I
10.1016/j.asieco.2009.09.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
First Japan and more recently China have pursued export-oriented growth strategies. While other Asian countries have done likewise, Japan and China are of particular interest because their economies are so large and the size of the associated bilateral trade imbalances with the United States so conspicuous. In this paper we focus on U.S. efforts to restore the reciprocal GATT/WTO market-access bargain in the face of such large imbalances and the significant spillovers to the international trading system. The paper highlights similarities and differences in the two cases. We describe U.S. attempts to reduce the bilateral imbalances through targeted trade policies intended to slow growth of U.S. imports from these countries or increase growth of U. S. exports to them. We then examine how these trade policy responses, as well as U. S. efforts to address what were perceived as underlying causes of the imbalances, influenced the evolution of the international trading system. Finally, we compare the macroeconomic conditions associated with the bilateral trade imbalances and their implications for the conclusions of the two episodes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 687
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   An economic theory of GATT [J].
Bagwell, K ;
Staiger, RW .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (01) :215-248
[2]  
Bagwell K., 2002, EC WORLD TRADING SYS
[3]  
BAYARD T, 1994, RECIPROCITY RETALIAT
[4]  
Bergsten C. Fred, 2008, CHINAS RISE CHALLENG
[5]  
Bhagwati Jagdish, 1990, AGGRESSIVE UNILATERA
[6]  
Bown C., 2002, WORLD TRADE REV, V1, P47
[7]  
Bown C., 2002, ECON POLIT-OXFORD, V14, P283, DOI [10.1111/1468-0343.00109, DOI 10.1111/1468-0343.00109]
[8]   The Zeroing Issue: a critical analysis of Softwood V [J].
Bown, Chad P. ;
Sykes, Alan O. .
WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2008, 7 (01) :121-142
[9]  
Bown Chad P, 2007, SUMNER CROIX CHALLEN
[10]  
Bown Chad P., 2009, FLETCHER FORUM WORLD, V33, P27