Personal constructs affecting interpersonal trust and willingness to share knowledge between architects in project design teams

被引:40
作者
Ding, Zhikun [1 ]
Ng, Fungfai [1 ]
Cai, Qiying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Room 523,Knowles Bldg,Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Knowledge management; interpersonal trust; personal construct theory; knowledge sharing; full grid technique;
D O I
10.1080/01446190701468828
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Architectural design is a knowledge-intensive activity. However, architects are not always willing to share their knowledge with their team members. Based on a literature review and in-depth interviews, this research identifies and validates factors as well as the underlying personal constructs that influence architects' interpersonal trust and willingness to share their knowledge in project design teams in China. The results of triangulation data analysis show that there are four factors affecting both interpersonal trust and willingness to share knowledge, i.e. 'team member's attitude towards work', 'team member's ability with regard to work', 'team member's personality' and 'team member's social interaction'. Contrary to previous findings, interpersonal trust is not identified as an individual factor influencing willingness to share knowledge. The personal constructs underlying each factor e.g. 'hard working-lazy when working', etc. are summarized and can be employed as measurement scales in designing future quantitative research, i.e. the explanatory study. Moreover, the identified personal constructs provide directions for the management in architectural design institutes to encourage knowledge sharing behaviour among architects.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 950
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks [J].
Abrams, LC ;
Cross, R ;
Lesser, E ;
Levin, DZ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2003, 17 (04) :64-77
[2]  
Aldenderfer M. S., 1984, CLUSTER ANAL, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412983648
[3]   A formal model of trust based on outcomes [J].
Bhattacharya, R ;
Devinney, TM ;
Pillutla, MM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :459-472
[4]   Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation [J].
Blackler, F .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1995, 16 (06) :1021-1046
[5]  
BRAGANZA A, 2002, KNOWLEDGE PROCESS MA, V9, P23, DOI DOI 10.1002/KPM.130
[6]  
Choi Y.S., 2000, THESIS
[7]  
Chow CW., 2000, J MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT, V12, P65, DOI [DOI 10.2308/JMAR.2000.12.1.65, 10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.65]
[8]   Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing [J].
Cook, SDN ;
Brown, JS .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :381-400
[9]  
Davenport TH, 1997, KNOWLEDGE PROCESS MA, V4, P187, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199709)4:3<187::AID-KPM99>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-A