AN EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSURANCE BONDING SYSTEM ON PLAYER BEHAVIOR IN A SIMULATED FIRM

被引:15
作者
CORNWELL, L
COSTANZA, R
机构
[1] Maryland International Institute for Ecological Economics, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, University of Maryland, Solomons
关键词
ASSURANCE BONDING SYSTEM; SIMULATION MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/0921-8009(94)90202-X
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
It has long been recognized that the present command and control methods for pollution abatement are inefficient. Using market mechanisms for environmental management is a promising alternative to the direct regulatory approach. Market mechanisms are just beginning to appear in U.S. environmental policy. For example, tradable permit schemes are being developed and implemented for some air pollutants under the amended Clean Air Act. Various other forms of taxes and tradable permits have been proposed; however, these systems do not address the large uncertainty inherent in most environmental problems. One mechanism currently being studied to address uncertainty more effectively is a flexible environmental assurance bonding system, designed to incorporate environmental criteria and uncertainty into market incentives. This study uses an experimental approach, employing an interactive computer game/simulation model with human players to examine the effectiveness of the assurance bonding system under varying degrees of uncertainty. An environmental cost efficiency index (ECEI), or profit per unit waste, is used to measure player performance, Preliminary results indicate that players are more successful under the assurance bonding system, in terms of ECEI, than under the simulated current system.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 226
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN BA, 1985, COLUMBIA J ENV LAW, V13, P171
[2]   UNCERTAINTY AND CHOICE OF POLLUTION-CONTROL INSTRUMENTS [J].
ADAR, Z ;
GRIFFIN, JM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1976, 3 (03) :178-188
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ECOL ECON
[4]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE AIR QUALITY-CONTROL STRATEGIES [J].
ATKINSON, SE ;
LEWIS, DH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1974, 1 (03) :237-250
[5]   DETERMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF OPTIMAL AIR-QUALITY STANDARDS [J].
ATKINSON, SE ;
LEWIS, DH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1976, 3 (04) :363-380
[6]   THE EMPIRICAL PROPERTIES OF 2 CLASSES OF DESIGNS FOR TRANSFERABLE DISCHARGE PERMIT MARKETS [J].
ATKINSON, SE ;
TIETENBERG, TH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1982, 9 (02) :101-121
[7]  
Axelrod R., 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[8]   MODEL OF REGULATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY AND A TEST OF REGULATORY BIAS [J].
BARON, DP ;
TAGGART, RA .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1977, 8 (01) :151-167
[9]  
Baumol W., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY
[10]   INTERACTIVE POLLUTANTS AND JOINT ABATEMENT COSTS - ACHIEVING WATER-QUALITY STANDARDS WITH EFFLUENT CHARGES [J].
BEAVIS, B ;
WALKER, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1979, 6 (04) :275-286